Let’s explore the 9mm vs 9 popular handgun cartridges using ballistic tables and graphs out to 100 yards. The 9mm’s velocity, trajectory, energy, and recoil are compared to all 9 cartridges providing a clear and data-driven perspective on how the 9mm stacks up.
When it comes to handgun ammunition, the 9mm cartridge stands out as a favorite among shooters. It’s known for its balance of power, ammo capacity, and ease of handling, the 9mm has become a staple in personal defense, law enforcement, and competitive shooting. But how does it stack up against other popular rounds like the .45 ACP, 10mm, .380 ACP, .357 Magnum, .38 Special, .357 Sig, .44 Magnum, .40 S&W, and .32 ACP? Let’s find out.
Table of Contents
How To Use This Article:
I used common bullets for the cartridges in this article for a realistic comparison. In the graphs and tables, I make sure to show the grain of each bullet for simple comparisons. All of the bullets in this article were made for self-defense.
The Ballistic Tables
If you want a 1-on-1 comparison from 0 to 100 yards in 25-yard increments for any of these cartridges to the 9mm, you can find that after the graphs in the ballistic tables section.
The Ballistic Graphs
Keep in mind that with different bullet grains and different ammunition, you can achieve different results than shown below. However, you can use the information below to determine the potential of each cartridge.
Let’s jump into the graphs first because they’ll answer your broader questions faster.
Velocity Ballistic Comparison Graph: 9mm vs Popular Cartridges
Below are velocity ballistic graphs of all 10 cartridges. The 9mm is shown as a black line in all graphs.
Trajectory Ballistic Comparison Graph: 9mm vs Popular Cartridges
Below are trajectory ballistic graphs of all 10 cartridges. The 9mm is shown as a black line in all graphs.
Bullet Energy (Stopping Power) Ballistic Comparison Graph: 9mm vs Popular Cartridges
Below are bullet energy or stopping power ballistic graphs of all 10 cartridges. The 9mm is shown as a black line in all graphs.
Recoil Comparison Graph: 9mm vs Popular Cartridges
Below are the recoil values of all 10 cartridges. The 9mm recoil energy and recoil velocity are shown as dottedblack lines for easy comparison to the other cartridges. This graph assumes that all cartridges are shot out of a handgun that weighs 30oz. This was done to create a better apples-to-apples comparison between cartridges.
Ballistic Tables: 9mm vs Popular Cartridges
9mm vs 45 ACP
Velocity
The 9mm (124 gr) consistently exhibits higher velocities than the .45 ACP (230 gr) at all distances from 0 to 100 yards. Starting faster at the muzzle (1150 fps vs 900 fps) and maintaining its speed advantage throughout, the 9mm demonstrates superior velocity retention over distance compared to the heavier .45 ACP.
Trajectory
The 9mm (124 gr) experiences less bullet drop compared to the .45 ACP (230 gr) at distances up to 100 yards. With a flatter trajectory, the 9mm shows a smaller decrease in height, dropping -8.8 inches at 100 yards compared to the .45 ACP’s drop of -14.6 inches. This indicates that the 9mm maintains a closer path to the line of sight over distance, making it more favorable for precision shooting.
Energy
At all distances up to 100 yards, the .45 ACP (230 gr) consistently exhibits higher bullet energy compared to the 9mm (124 gr). While the 9mm starts with an energy of 364 ft-lbs at the muzzle, the .45 ACP begins with a higher energy of 414 ft-lbs. This trend continues across distances, with the .45 ACP maintaining its energy lead, with 354 ft-lbs at 100 yards compared to the 9mm’s 263 ft-lbs. The heavier bullet of the .45 ACP contributes to its greater energy, making it potentially more powerful on targets.
Recoil
The .45 ACP (230 gr) exhibits significantly higher recoil than the 9mm (124 gr). Specifically, the .45 ACP has a recoil energy of 7.8 ft-lbs and a recoil velocity of 16.4 fps, which is notably higher than the 9mm’s recoil energy of 3.9 ft-lbs and recoil velocity of 11.6 fps. This increase in recoil for the .45 ACP is due to its heavier bullet and larger powder charge, resulting in a more pronounced kick when fired. The lower recoil of the 9mm makes it generally easier to handle and quicker for follow-up shots.
Calculation assumes a 30oz handgun*
9mm vs 10mm
Velocity
The 9mm (124 gr) generally exhibits higher velocities than the 10mm (200 gr) at all distances from 0 to 100 yards. Starting with a slightly higher velocity at the muzzle (1150 fps vs 1130 fps for the 10mm), the 9mm maintains its speed advantage throughout, showing superior velocity retention over distance compared to the 10mm. Just remember the bullet is much heavier for the 10mm.
Trajectory
The 9mm (124 gr) experiences less bullet drop compared to the 10mm (200 gr) at distances up to 100 yards. The 9mm shows a smaller decrease in height, dropping -8.8 inches at 100 yards compared to the 10mm’s drop of -10.0 inches. This indicates that the 9mm maintains a relatively flatter trajectory over distance. However, they’re very similar which is impressive since the 10mm bullet is much bigger.
Energy
The 10mm (200 gr) consistently exhibits significantly higher bullet energy than the 9mm (124 gr) at all distances from 0 to 100 yards. While the 9mm starts with an energy of 364 ft-lbs at the muzzle, the 10mm begins with a substantially higher energy of 567 ft-lbs. This higher energy level for the 10mm remains across all distances, demonstrating 361 ft-lbs at 100 yards compared to the 9mm’s 263 ft-lbs. The larger powder load and heavier bullet of the 10mm contribute to its greater energy, making it more powerful on impact, especially at closer ranges.
Recoil
The 10mm (200 gr) has significantly higher recoil than the 9mm (124 gr). Specifically, the 10mm exhibits a recoil energy of 10.2 ft-lbs and a recoil velocity of 18.7 fps, which are notably greater than the 9mm’s recoil energy of 3.9 ft-lbs and recoil velocity of 11.6 fps. This increase in recoil for the 10mm can be attributed to its more powerful load and heavier bullet, resulting in a stronger kick when fired. The lower recoil of the 9mm makes it generally easier to handle and quicker for follow-up shots, especially for shooters with less experience or lower tolerance for recoil.
Calculation assumes a 30oz handgun*
9mm vs 380
Velocity
The 9mm (124 gr) typically has higher velocities than the .380 ACP (99 gr) across all distances measured from 0 to 100 yards. The 9mm begins with a velocity of 1150 fps at the muzzle, compared to the .380 ACP’s initial velocity of 935 fps. This trend of the 9mm maintaining a higher velocity continues through each measured distance, indicating superior speed. If you’re looking for more in-depth information on the 9mm vs 380 you can check out my article: 380 vs 9mm Comparison (with Ballistic Tables & Graphs).
Trajectory
The 9mm (124 gr) experiences less bullet drop compared to the .380 ACP (99 gr) across distances up to 100 yards. The 9mm shows a trajectory drop of -8.8 inches at 100 yards, whereas the .380 ACP has a more pronounced bullet drop of -14.0 inches at the same distance. This indicates that the 9mm maintains a flatter trajectory over longer distances, which can be advantageous for accuracy.
Energy
The 9mm (124 gr) consistently has higher bullet energy compared to the .380 ACP (99 gr) at all distances from 0 to 100 yards. The 9mm starts with an energy of 364 ft-lbs at the muzzle, while the .380 ACP begins with 192 ft-lbs. This higher energy level for the 9mm is maintained across distances, demonstrating 263 ft-lbs at 100 yards compared to the .380 ACP’s 149 ft-lbs. The 9mm’s higher energy is due to its greater velocity and mass, contributing to more power.
Recoil
The .380 ACP (99 gr) has significantly lower recoil than the 9mm (124 gr). The .380 ACP exhibits a recoil energy of only 1.6 ft-lbs and a recoil velocity of 7.4 fps, which are considerably less than the 9mm’s recoil energy of 3.9 ft-lbs and recoil velocity of 11.6 fps. This reduced recoil in the .380 ACP can be attributed to its lighter bullet and less powerful load, making it easier to handle, especially for shooters who are sensitive to recoil or prefer a more manageable shooting experience.
Calculation assumes a 30oz handgun*
9mm vs 357 Magnum
Velocity
The .357 Magnum (158 gr) typically has higher velocities than the 9mm (124 gr) at all distances from 0 to 100 yards. The .357 Magnum starts with a velocity of 1240 fps at the muzzle, compared to the 9mm’s initial velocity of 1150 fps. This trend of the .357 Magnum maintaining higher velocity continues throughout the distance range, indicating its superior speed.
Trajectory
The 9mm (124 gr) and the .357 Magnum (158 gr) exhibit similar trajectories, with the .357 Magnum showing slightly less bullet drop at longer distances. The 9mm experiences a drop of -8.8 inches at 100 yards, while the .357 Magnum has a slightly lower bullet drop of -7.1 inches at the same distance. Both cartridges maintain relatively flat trajectories, but the .357 Magnum’s marginally superior performance in this aspect can be largely attributed to its higher velocity.
Energy
The .357 Magnum (158 gr) consistently delivers significantly higher bullet energy than the 9mm (124 gr) at all distances from 0 to 100 yards. Starting with an energy of 539 ft-lbs at the muzzle, the .357 Magnum surpasses the 9mm’s initial energy of 364 ft-lbs. This trend continues across distances, with the .357 Magnum demonstrating 396 ft-lbs at 100 yards, compared to the 9mm’s 263 ft-lbs. The higher energy of the .357 Magnum is due to its greater velocity and heavier bullet, resulting in more power.
Recoil
The .357 Magnum (158 gr) exhibits significantly higher recoil than the 9mm (124 gr). Specifically, the .357 Magnum has a recoil energy of 8.5 ft-lbs and a recoil velocity of 17.1 fps. In contrast, the 9mm’s recoil energy is lower at 3.9 ft-lbs, with a recoil velocity of 11.6 fps. The increased recoil in the .357 Magnum can be attributed to its more powerful cartridge and heavier bullet, resulting in a more substantial kick when fired. This higher recoil level can affect shooter comfort and the speed of follow-up shots, especially for those less accustomed to handling higher-recoil firearms.
Calculation assumes a 30oz handgun*
9mm vs 38 Special
Velocity
The 9mm (124 gr) generally has higher velocities than the .38 Special (120 gr) across all distances from 0 to 100 yards. At the muzzle, the 9mm starts with a velocity of 1150 fps, compared to the .38 Special’s initial velocity of 1000 fps. This higher velocity of the 9mm continues through each measured distance, indicating superior speed.
Trajectory
The 9mm (124 gr) experiences less bullet drop compared to the .38 Special (120 gr) at distances up to 100 yards. The 9mm shows a bullet drop of -8.8 inches at 100 yards, while the .38 Special exhibits a more pronounced drop of -12.7 inches at the same distance. This indicates that the 9mm maintains a flatter trajectory over longer distances, which increases accuracy.
Energy
The 9mm (124 gr) generally exhibits higher bullet energy than the .38 Special (120 gr) at all distances from 0 to 100 yards. The 9mm starts with an energy of 364 ft-lbs at the muzzle, whereas the .38 Special begins with slightly lower energy, at 266 ft-lbs. As the distance increases, this trend continues, with the 9mm maintaining a higher energy level, registering 263 ft-lbs at 100 yards compared to the .38 Special’s 186 ft-lbs. The higher energy and power of the 9mm can be attributed to its greater velocity.
Recoil
The .38 Special (120 gr) has lower recoil compared to the 9mm (124 gr). Specifically, the .38 Special exhibits a recoil energy of 2.7 ft-lbs and a recoil velocity of 9.7 fps, both of which are less than the 9mm’s recoil energy of 3.9 ft-lbs and recoil velocity of 11.6 fps. The reduced recoil in the .38 Special is due to its lighter load and lower pressure, making it easier to handle, especially for shooters who prefer a firearm with less kick. This can make the .38 Special a more comfortable choice for recoil-sensitive shooters.
Calculation assumes a 30oz handgun*
9mm vs 357 Sig
Velocity
The .357 Sig (125 gr) typically exhibits higher velocities than the 9mm (124 gr) at all distances from 0 to 100 yards. At the muzzle, the .357 Sig starts with a velocity of 1350 fps, surpassing the 9mm’s initial velocity of 1150 fps. This higher velocity of the .357 Sig is maintained throughout the distance range, indicating superior speed at the same bullet weight.
Trajectory
The 9mm (124 gr) and the .357 Sig (125 gr) have similar trajectories, but the .357 Sig shows slightly less bullet drop at longer distances. While the 9mm experiences a bullet drop of about -8.8 inches at 100 yards, the .357 Sig has a slightly lower drop of -6.1 inches at the same distance. Both cartridges maintain relatively flat trajectories, but the higher initial velocity of the .357 Sig contributes to its marginally better performance in maintaining a closer path to the line of sight over distance.
Energy
The .357 Sig (125 gr) consistently delivers higher bullet energy than the 9mm (124 gr) across all distances from 0 to 100 yards. The .357 Sig starts with an impressive energy of 506 ft-lbs at the muzzle, substantially surpassing the 9mm’s initial energy of 364 ft-lbs. This trend of higher energy in the .357 Sig continues as the distance increases, with the cartridge demonstrating 323 ft-lbs at 100 yards compared to the 9mm’s 263 ft-lbs. The higher energy of the .357 Sig is largely due to its greater velocity.
Recoil
The .357 Sig (125 gr) exhibits higher recoil than the 9mm (124 gr). The .357 Sig has a recoil energy of 6.3 ft-lbs and a recoil velocity of 14.7 fps, both higher than the 9mm’s recoil energy of 3.9 ft-lbs and recoil velocity of 11.6 fps. This increased recoil in the .357 Sig can be attributed to its higher velocity and energy, resulting in a stronger kick when fired. The more pronounced recoil of the .357 Sig may affect shooter comfort and the speed of follow-up shots, particularly for those less accustomed to handling higher-recoil firearms.
Calculation assumes a 30oz handgun*
9mm vs 44 Magnum
Velocity
The .44 Magnum (240 gr) is almost double the weight of the 9mm (124 gr) yet still is has faster velocities at all distances from 0 to 100 yards. The .44 Magnum starts with a velocity of 1210 fps at the muzzle, compared to the 9mm’s 1150 fps. Despite its larger and heavier bullet, the .44 Magnum maintains higher velocities across the measured distances, suggesting superior ballistic performance, especially in terms of speed.
Trajectory
The 9mm (124 gr) and the .44 Magnum (240 gr) have similar trajectories, but the .44 Magnum shows slightly less bullet drop at longer distances. The 9mm experiences a drop of -8.8 inches at 100 yards, while the .44 Magnum drops about -7.7 inches at the same distance. Both cartridges exhibit relatively flat trajectories, but the .44 Magnum’s higher velocity contributes to its slightly better performance in maintaining a flatter trajectory over distance.
Energy
The .44 Magnum (240 gr) significantly outperforms the 9mm (124 gr) in terms of bullet energy at all distances. At the muzzle, the .44 Magnum starts with a remarkable energy of 780 ft-lbs, much higher than the 9mm’s 364 ft-lbs. This high energy level of the .44 Magnum is consistent across all distances, maintaining a substantial lead over the 9mm, with 559 ft-lbs at 100 yards compared to the 9mm’s 263 ft-lbs. The .44 Magnum’s higher energy can be attributed to its big and heavy bullet that moves at high velocity resulting in a lot of power.
Recoil
The .44 Magnum (240 gr) has significantly higher recoil than the 9mm (124 gr). The .44 Magnum exhibits a recoil energy of 18.7 ft-lbs and a recoil velocity of 25.4 fps, substantially more than the 9mm’s recoil energy of 3.9 ft-lbs and recoil velocity of 11.6 fps. The increased recoil in the .44 Magnum is due to its higher energy and larger caliber, resulting in a much stronger kick when fired. This higher recoil can affect shooter comfort and make accurate follow-up shots more challenging, especially for less experienced shooters.
Calculation assumes a 30oz handgun*
9mm vs 40 S&W
Velocity
The 9mm (124 gr) generally has higher velocities than the .40 S&W (180 gr) across all distances from 0 to 100 yards. The 9mm starts with a muzzle velocity of 1150 fps, compared to 1010 fps for the .40 S&W. This trend of the 9mm maintaining higher velocity continues through each distance, indicating its superior speed and potential for a flatter trajectory over distance.
Trajectory
The 9mm (124 gr) experiences less bullet drop compared to the .40 S&W (180 gr) at distances up to 100 yards. The 9mm shows a bullet drop of -8.8 inches at 100 yards, while the .40 S&W has a drop of -11.4 inches at the same distance. This indicates a relatively flatter trajectory for the 9mm, which can benefit accuracy.
Energy
The .40 S&W (180 gr) typically exhibits slightly higher bullet energy than the 9mm (124 gr) at all distances from 0 to 100 yards. The .40 S&W starts with an energy of 408 ft-lbs at the muzzle, slightly higher than the 9mm’s 364 ft-lbs. This trend of higher energy in the .40 S&W continues across distances, albeit the difference is not as pronounced as with larger calibers like the .44 Magnum.
Recoil
The .40 S&W (180 gr) has higher recoil than the 9mm (124 gr). The .40 S&W exhibits a recoil energy of 6.1 ft-lbs and a recoil velocity of 14.5 fps, both higher than the 9mm’s recoil energy of 3.9 ft-lbs and recoil velocity of 11.6 fps. The increased recoil in the .40 S&W can be attributed to its heavier bullet and higher energy, resulting in a stronger kick when fired.
Calculation assumes a 30oz handgun*
9mm vs 32 ACP
Velocity
The 9mm (124 gr) consistently exhibits higher velocities than the .32 ACP (65 gr) across all distances from 0 to 100 yards. It starts with a muzzle velocity of 1150 fps, while the .32 ACP begins at 925 fps. The 9mm maintains this velocity advantage throughout the range, demonstrating superior speed.
Trajectory
The 9mm (124 gr) experiences less bullet drop compared to the .32 ACP (65 gr) at distances up to 100 yards. The 9mm shows a trajectory drop of -8.8 inches at 100 yards, whereas the .32 ACP experiences a more significant drop of -14.5 inches at the same distance. This indicates that the 9mm maintains a flatter trajectory over longer distances which increases accuracy.
Energy
The 9mm (124 gr) has higher bullet energy than the .32 ACP (65 gr) at all measured distances. The 9mm starts with 364 ft-lbs of energy at the muzzle, in contrast to the .32 ACP’s 123 ft-lbs. As the distance increases, the 9mm continues to outperform the .32 ACP in terms of energy, with 263 ft-lbs at 100 yards compared to the .32 ACP’s 94 ft-lbs. The higher energy of the 9mm is a result of its greater velocity and heavier bullet.
Recoil
The .32 ACP (65 gr) exhibits significantly lower recoil than the 9mm (124 gr). The .32 ACP has a recoil energy of only 0.7 ft-lbs and a recoil velocity of 5.0 fps, much lower than the 9mm’s recoil energy of 3.9 ft-lbs and recoil velocity of 11.6 fps. The reduced recoil of the .32 ACP is due to its lighter bullet and less powerful load, its an exteamly low recoil cartridge but at the cost of power.
Calculation assumes a 30oz handgun*
Final Thoughts: 9mm vs Popular Cartridges
As we’ve seen through our comprehensive comparisons, the 9mm (124 gr) cartridge holds its own as a well-rounded choice in the diverse world of handgun ammunition. Its balance of, velocity, bullet size, and power, make it a comfortable and reliable option for personal defense. In terms of energy, while the 9mm doesn’t always lead the pack, especially against powerhouses like the .44 Magnum and 10mm, it still delivers sufficient stopping power for human-to-human defense.
One of the standout features of the 9mm is its manageable recoil, which stands in stark contrast to more powerful cartridges like the .357 Magnum and .40 S&W. This lower recoil not only makes the 9mm accessible to a wider range of shooters but also facilitates quicker, more accurate follow-up shots, a critical factor in both self-defense and competitive shooting.
While cartridges like the .45 ACP and .380 ACP have their niches, the 9mm’s balance of power, capacity, and ease of handling keeps it at the forefront of firearm choices. Whether for law enforcement, self-defense, or sports shooting, the 9mm’s versatility and effectiveness are undeniable. It’s a testament to why, after so many years, the 9mm continues to be a popular and trusted choice among handgun enthusiasts.
In the end, the best cartridge depends on individual needs and preferences. However, for those seeking a middle ground in power, precision, and usability, the 9mm emerges not just as a jack-of-all-trades, but as a master of many.
This post covers the best gloves for duck hunting which include heated gloves, warm gloves, waterproof decoy gloves, and waterproof gloves. Sitka, Cabela’s, and Hot Hands are some of the best brands to look for when choosing duck hunting gloves.
There are different types of gloves duck hunters use for different scenarios. You’ll find the best gloves for all duck hunting scenarios.
This post contains Amazon and other affiliate links, which means I’ll receive a commission if you purchase through my link, at no extra cost to you. Of course, you are not obligated to use my links, but it does help fund these posts in hopes of bringing more value to you!
Table of Contents
Best Heated Gloves For Duck Hunting
When you’re duck hunting in cold conditions it’s easy for your hands and fingers to get cold. Heated gloves are a great choice to fight back against the elements. These heated gloves are great because they are fast charging but also can be charged via a power bank for all-day warmth.
Waterproof decoy gloves are great options for keeping hands warm while duck hunting. They’re not to be used for the entire hunt, they’re only for setting and retrieving decoys. This keeps your regular gloves dryer and thus your hands warmer for the rest of the hunt.
Rubber Thinsulate Insulated Gloves (Elbow Length Long Gloves)
These duck hunting gloves have nice soft fleece-like insulation in them that keeps hands warm and cozy on the coldest duck hunting days, which is important for an enjoyable hunt. Additionally, they’re waterproof, keeping hands dry when handling decoys or anything wet out on the water. Rubber is also more durable than neoprene and cleans easily.
Neoprene DecoyPro Decoy Gloves (Elbow Length Long Gloves)
Neoprene duck hunting decoy gloves keep hands dry when handling decoys. The neoprene in these gloves is relatively thick, which provides insulation for cold duck hunting days. This also takes longer for the cold water to make your hands cold which is a plus.
These gloves are windproof, water-resistant, warm, and provide dexterity for shooting. They are thick and warm windproof gloves that provide water resistance by utilizing Windstopper fabric. These gloves are also convertible mittens for ultimate warmth while providing shooting finger dexterity.
These are the Hot Shot insulated waterproof gloves. They are one of the best budget gloves you can get for duck hunting in cold weather. 40 grams of 3M Thinsulate insulation keeps your hands warm, a waterproof lining keeps your hands dry, and they’re comfortable with pre-curved fingers and non-slip grips. They probably won’t last as long as the other gloves on this list, but for the price, you can afford to buy new ones if they wear out.
The Delta Deek Gore-Tex gloves by Sitka are another excellent versatile pair of duck hunting gloves. They have waterproof and windproof removable outer shells which keep hands protected against the elements. On warmer days you can just take the outer liner off. The inner liner is berber fleece which adds insulation and warmth.
This is Sitka’s version of a convertible mitten and glove. It uses Gore-tex and Windstopper for protection against the elements. These gloves are insulated with Primaloft, which is one of the top insulators on the market making them very warm.
This is a unique duck hunting glove and is sold as a single glove (for your non-shooting hand). Built into this glove is a Berber fleece-lined hand muff for your shooting hand. This allows you to keep your shooting hand warm while keeping it glove-free for ultimate shooting and calling dexterity. You can buy right and left-handed options.
These gloves are great because they are waterproof and windproof with a breathable gore-tex membrane. These gloves are perfect for just about any scenario from boating, picking up decoys, picking up shotgun shells in the water, and handling wet ducks.
The leather on these gloves also adds grip. They are a perfect size, not too big but big enough to provide good insulation. These gloves are great for hunting in temps around +/- 30ºF.
Your hands are one of the most noticeable parts of your body to ducks. It is beneficial to cover them with gloves for camouflage even if it’s not cold out. Also, in warm weather, you’ll want a lightweight glove with good dexterity. These gloves don’t need to be fancy, they just need to hide your hands.
These Mossy Oak gloves below are one of the best budget duck hunting gloves for the early season. They are lightweight and tight to the hand. They also allow you to use your phone with them on.
Wool is one of mother nature’s greatest natural materials. Wool is water-resistant, moisture-wicking, odor resistant, stays warm when wet, breathable and cool when hot, silent, has excellent insulating properties, and is durable. For these reasons, it’s an excellent addition to regular hunting gloves to improve their warmth.Â
Hand muffs are basically gold to duck hunters in frigid temperatures. When hands are cold it’s hard to enjoy yourself or think about anything else until your hands become warm. Hand muffs are one of the best gifts for duck hunters for this reason. The Sitka hand muff uses Gore-Tex and Windstopper layers with Primaloft insulation to block wind and keep hands warm.
In this post, you’ll learn what the best hunting dog kennels and crates are for your style of hunting. Since kennels and crates are designed differently than others, this post covers the pros and cons of the top hunting kennels and crates so you can make the best decision for you.
This post contains Amazon and other affiliate links, which means I’ll receive a commission if you purchase through my link, at no extra cost to you. Of course, you are not obligated to use my links, but it does help fund these posts in hopes of bringing more value to you!
The Gunner Kennels are the best hunting dog kennels on the market for many reasons. They check all of the boxes when it comes to features hunters are looking for in a dog kennel for hunting dogs. The feature that separates these kennels from others is that they’re great for transporting dogs in vehicles because they’re sturdy, stable, 5-star crash rated, and insulated. Below you’ll find a list of the pros and cons of the Gunner G-1 kennel:
Pros
Cons
Breaks into two pieces for transportation
Wheels for transportation
5-star crash safety rating
Double-wall Insulation (good for cold and heat)
Drain hole
All-weather kits
Good ventilation
Handles
Tie Down Brackets
Lockable Door
Big and Heavy
Expensive
Gunner G-1 Kennels
Lucky Duck’s Lucky Kennel
The Lucky Duck Kennel is another excellent hunting dog kennel, it’s one of the best hunting dog kennels on the market because of its 5-star crash safety rating and ergonomics. The most notable features of this hunting kennel are listed below:
The Dakota283 hunting dog kennel is not as feature-rich as the Gunner and Lucky Duck kennels. However, it is still a great option and is less expensive.
Pros
Cons
Drain hole
Built-in handle
Good ventilation
Stackable
Lockable Door
Adjustable door
Top drain
Lightweight
The door is flimsy and can get dog paws caught in it
Ruff Land Kennels is another brand that makes one of the best hunting kennels. This kennel isn’t as well suited for transportation in the bed of a pickup truck as the above-mentioned kennels because it does not have insulation or a door lock and is very lightweight. That being said, they’re excellent for home use and can work for transportation if placed inside of a vehicle.
Pros
Cons
Lightweight kennel
Lots of accessories and add-ons (fan, cover, nameplate, doors, handles, totes, brackets to mount to each other…etc.)
This Petmate kennel is the least durable kennel because it’s made of thinner plastic. Because it’s a two-piece design it’s even less durable than the Ruff Land Kennel. However, they’re very lightweight and easy to pack for hunting trips. This kennel is one of the best options for hunters who don’t kennel their dogs when traveling.
Pros
Cons
Lightweight
Lots of accessories and add-ons (fan, cover, nameplate, doors, handles, totes, brackets to mount to each other…etc.)
Owens Products 3-Dog Hunting Kennel With Top Storage
This kennel by Owens Products is great for hunters or dog trainers who want to safely carry multiple dogs in a truck bed while still having storage space on top for dog/hunting essentials. They’re lockable and have tie-down brackets which make them great for travel.
Owens Products 3-Dog Hunting Kennel With Top Storage
The Owens Products 3-dog kennel is basically the same as the kennel above except it doesn’t have extra room on top for additional storage. This 3-dog kennel is great for hunters or dog trainers who want to safely carry multiple dogs in a truck bed. They’re lockable and have tie-down brackets which make them great for travel.
Another great Owens Products kennel is the 2-Dog ATV kennel. It’s basically the same as the truck versions above but in a smaller package so you can put it into the back of an ATV.
One of the very best crates for hunting dogs is the MidWest Homes crate because it’s simple to set up, lightweight, portable, and works well. There are also single-door and double-door options.
Another one of the best crates for hunting dogs is this heavy-duty crate. This crate was designed for dogs who need a stronger kennel than the more thin kennels. It’s more difficult to transport than the crate above because it does not assemble and disassemble as easily. For this reason, it makes a great permanent location crate.
Vehicle Seat Cover Kennel Alternative For Hunting Dogs
Transporting dogs inside of a vehicle with a dog seat cover is another great option for hunting dogs. Hunting and training with a hunting dog will usually result in a wet, muddy, brushy, and stinky pup. Seat covers keep the dog safe with the hammock-like design and keep the vehicle clean, especially after hunting trips
Vehicle Seat Cover Kennel Alternative For Hunting Dogs
In this post, we are looking at the best trail cameras for the money in 2025 for hunting, wildlife, and security. Buying trail cameras can be confusing because there are so many different companies making them and there are a lot of specs to understand.
To make matters more difficult many trail camera companies lie or exaggerate their specs for marketing purposes only to leave you disappointed when you start using the camera.
I make it easy to pick the best trail camera for the money by listing trustworthy trail camera companies and camera models with good reputations so that you know your money will be spent well.
This post contains Amazon and other affiliate links, which means I’ll receive a commission if you purchase through my link, at no extra cost to you. Of course, you are not obligated to use my links, but it does help fund these posts in hopes of bringing more value to you!
Trail Camera Companies Lie For Marketing
Don’t Buy Into The Megapixel Hype
Don’t buy into the megapixel hype when it comes to buying trail cameras. Trail camera companies are using high megapixel numbers for marketing purposes to attract buyers. These numbers are not usually representative of image quality.
Companies are able to get away with this by using a process called interpolation. This digitally adds megapixels to photos without improving image quality. For this reason, megapixel counts should be taken with a grain of salt. Instead, looking at actual examples of photos is the best determining factor.
Are Cheap Trail Cameras Worth The Money?
Trail cameras in the under 100$ range are usually not worth the money. These cameras will often break in the first couple of years of use and even malfunction during the first year of use.
It is better to buy a more expensive camera that will get you many years of reliable use, rather than keeping your fingers crossed for those cheaper trail cameras to work.
This is especially important for hunters because there’s nothing worse than checking your trail camera at the end of the year only to find out that it stopped working 2-months from when you set it.
Trail Camera Comparison Spreadsheet
The Best Trail Cameras For The Money
Organize the spreadsheet below by the trail camera specs that are most important to you.
Trail Camera Model
Price ($)
Tigger Speed (s)
Megapixels
Daytime Range (ft)
Nighttime Range (ft)
Flash Type
Recovery Time (s)
Battery Life (Months)
Video Res.
Bushnell Trophy Cam
132
0.3
16
80
80
Low-Glow IR
1
5
1280x720 @ 30 fps
Browning Strike Force HD Pro XÂ
160
0.2
20
80
80
Infared Glow
0.7
17
1600x900 @ 30 fps
Spypoint Force Pro Cellular Trail Camera
160
0.2
30
100
100
No Glow IR
1.3
28
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
Browning Spec Ops Elite HP4
190
0.01
22
90
90
No Glow IR
0.6
36
1920x1080 @ 60 fps
Bushnell 30MP CORE Trail Camera
219
0.2
30
80
80
No Glow IR
0.6
12
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
Best Cellular Trail Cameras For The Money
You can also sort the spreadsheet below by the cellular trail camera specs that are most important to you.
Cellular Trail Camera Model
Price ($)
Tigger Speed (s)
Megapixels
Daytime Range (ft)
Nighttime Range (ft)
Flash Type
Recovery Time (s)
Battery Life (Months)
Video Res.
Spypoint Link Micro LTE
100
0.6
10
110
110
Infared Glow
66
2.5
n/a
Spypoint Link Micro S LTE
120
0.45
10
110
110
Infared Glow
73
2.5+
n/a
Browning Defender Wireless Pro Scout
190
0.3
18
90
90
Infared Glow
26.2
10.5
1600x900 @ 30 fps
Spypoint Link-S-Dark
299
0.07
12
90
90
No Glow IR
63
5+
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
Exodus Render 4G LTE
335
0.3
12
70
65
No Glow IR
25
6+
640x360 @ 15 fps
RidgeTec Lookout 4G LTE
300
0.5
12
100
100
No Glow IR
28
4
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
HCO Spartan Go-Live
500
0.6
8
70
70
No Glow IR
Varies
9
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
Best Hunting & Wildlife Trail Cameras For The Money
Criteria That Make Trail Cameras The Best
Trigger Speed
Camera Resolution Quality
Video Resolution
Daytime Detection Range
Nighttime Detection Range
Flash Type
Photo Recovery Time
Battery Life
Build-Quality/Reliability
Ease of Use
Warranty
The Best Trail Camera For The Money Under 100$
As mentioned above, you should be careful when buying trail cameras under 100$ because they are, in my experience, notorious for malfunctioning very quickly. For this reason, if you’re looking to buy a trail camera under 100$ I would suggest buying something close to the 100$ mark. For example, you can get a pretty decent trail camera for 99$ but I would stay away from trail cameras that are cheaper than 90$.
Best Trail Cameras For The Money Under 150$
Once you start getting above 100$ trail cameras start becoming more reliable and have better specs. You can find some decent trail cameras in this price range. For example:
Bushnell Trophy Cam Essential E3 Trail Camera
This trail camera is one of the best trail cameras for the money because of how many features you get for the price. For example, this camera takes 16-megapixel photos at a fast trigger speed of 0.3 seconds. This camera takes about 1 second to recover after taking photos before it can take more photos.
It also has a respectable 80′ daytime and nighttime detection range. This camera uses low-glow IR sensors to capture nighttime photos. Depending on the settings, Bushnell claims this camera can last up to 1-year on one set of batteries but tests from Trail Cam Pro indicate that you’re realistically looking at 5 months. The Bushnell Trophy Cam is built well to withstand the elements for the entire duration of its use.
Right around the 200$ price range is where you start seeing reliable trail cameras being made with great specs. These +/- 200$ cameras are likely where you will get the best trail cameras for the money. The reason for this is these cameras have the durability and the specs to get the job done reliably and with high quality for many years.
Browning Strike Force HD Pro X Trail Camera
The Browning Strike Force HD Pro X is one of the best trail cameras for the money. For just a little more money than the Bushnell Trophy Cam (above) you get a faster trigger speed, higher-quality images, faster photo recovery time, and an insane battery life of 17+ months with just 6 AA batteries.
The Spypoint Force Pro is another great option at the same price point as the Browning Strike Force HD Pro X. The difference is this game camera has better specs, making it an even better value for the money. It has a fast 0.2 trigger speed, 30 MP resolution, 100 ft detection range, invisible glow infrared, 1080p HD video, and 28 months of battery life with 8 AA lithium batteries.Â
The recovery time of 1.3s is slightly slower than the Browning Strike Force Pro X’s 0.7s.
The Browning Spec Ops Elite HP4 is a top-notch trail camera with some great specs. For example, it has a blazing fast 0.01 trigger speed, the 22 megapixels take high-quality photos, has a 90 ft detection range, uses invisible infrared flash, has a fast 0.6s recovery time, and can last an amazing 36 months on one set of lithium batteries.
The HP4 also takes 1080p Full HD video up to 60 fps. With the fast trigger speed and high frame rate of this camera, there should be virtually no blurring in photos with movement.
Bushnell Core Dual-Sensor (DS) No-Glow Trail Camera
The Bushnell Core Dual-Sensor No-Glow trail camera is one of the best trail cameras for the money if you’re looking for state-of-the-art trail camera resolution and an invisible nighttime flash. 30-megapixel photos generate very crisp and high-detailed photos. Additionally, the videos are full 1080P HD which is very crisp as well.
In addition to the resolution, this camera offers great specs including a 0.2s trigger speed, 80′ detection range during the day and night, 0.6s photo recovery time, and 12 months of battery life.
Best Entry-Level Cellular Trail Camera For The Money Under 100$
Spypoint Link Micro LTE Cellular Trail Camera
The Spypoint Link Micro LTE is a very affordable trail camera. It’s one of the lowest-priced cellular trail cameras that will still work well. For this reason, it is a great camera for getting started in the cellular camera game.
That said, like all trail cameras, you get what you pay for. For example, this trail camera lacks behind in battery life, picture quality, and internal programming. But if battery life isn’t super important to you and you don’t need the best specs for what you’re using the camera for, then this is the camera for you.
Best Cellular Trail Camera For The Money Under 200$
Spypoint Link Micro S LTE Cellular Trail Camera
The Spypoint Link Micro LTE and Spypoint Link Micro S LTE are basically the same cameras with one big and obvious difference, a solar panel. This solar panel helps increase the poor battery life on these cameras (only lasting 2.5 months). This should allow the camera to take photos for a very long time as long as the solar panels do not get covered with debris and it has access to sunlight.
Because this camera addresses the biggest issue of the regular Spypoint Link Micro LTE, it earns a spot on this list. Just keep in mind that this camera is only 10mp and the photos are not very crisp but if that’s not a deal-breaker this is one of the best cellular trail cameras for the money.
As far as cellular cameras go, this is one of the best trail cameras for the money. It takes quality images, has a 90 ft detection range, has a fast recovery time for a cellular camera (26s), and an impressive 10.5 months of battery life (for a cellular trail camera).
If you’re looking for the next step up from the Spypoint cellular cameras, the Browning Defender Wireless Pro is an excellent option. The trade-off with the camera is the price when compared to the Spypoint cameras listed above, this camera is about 2x the price. That said, for a lot of people, these extra qualities of this camera are well worth it.
Best Cellular Trail Camera For The Money Under 300$
Spypoint Link-S-Dark Cellular Trail Camera
The Spypoint Link S Dark is one of the best cellular cameras for the money because of the additional features you get compared to the cheaper Spypoint cameras listed above. For example, you get a very fast trigger speed of 0.07s, 12-megapixels, 90 ft detection range, and 1080p HD video at 30 fps.
You also get 5 months of battery life with just the internal batteries but with the solar panel that comes with it, you can make your camera last much longer.Â
Best Cellular Trail Camera For The Money Under 400$
Exodus Render 4G LTE Verizon Cellular Trail Camera
On paper, the Exodus Render cellular trail camera might look like it is lacking in specs for the price. However, unlike other trail camera companies, Exodus is conservative with their camera specs so they ensure you are getting what you pay for in specs. Because of Exodus’ honesty about their specs and their generous 5-year warranty you know you are getting exactly what you pay for or better. For these reasons, it is one of the best trail cameras for the money.
The Exodus Render has a 0.3s trigger speed, 12 megapixels, 70 ft detection range, invisible no-glow infrared flash, fast 25 second recovery time, and will take between 500-5000 photos before the internal batteries die depending on camera settings. You also have the option to add a solar panel to this camera to increase the battery life greatly.
Best Cellular Trail Cameras For Security/Surveillance For The Money
RidgeTec Lookout 4G LTE Cellular Trail Camera
The RidgeTec Lookout is an excellent security cellular trail camera for the money. It has a 0.5s trigger speed, 12-megapixel camera, 100 ft detection range, invisible no-glow infrared flash that takes great night photos, a very fast 28s recovery time, and takes 1080P HD videos at 30 fps. Another great feature of this camera is that you can buy different sim cards for it depending on which carrier has better service in the area you want to put the camera (vs buying a whole new camera).
One downside is that it has a fairly limited battery life of four months, but as a security camera this might not be a problem for you.
HCO Spartan Go-Live Live Streaming Cellular Trail Camera
The HCO Spartan Go-Live has the ability to live-stream which is an awesome feature for a cellular trail cam. This also makes it a great feature for security because you can tap into your camera’s feed at any time.
The Go-Live has a trigger speed is 0.6s, an 8-megapixel camera, a 70 ft detection range, invisible no-glow IR, a variable recovery time, 1080p HD video, and up to 9 months of battery life.
Even though the megapixels are less than the RidgeTec, the daytime photos are better on this camera.
Trail camera detection ranges commonly fall between 70-100 feet. That said, each trail camera is different. The detection range of an individual trail camera should be listed in the product description of the trail camera.Â
Best Batteries For Trail Cameras
Lithium Batteries
Lithium batteries make a world of difference and are often overlooked. They are much more efficient and work better especially in cold weather, making them superior in trail cameras. The only downside to these batteries is that they’re more expensive than regular batteries but they pay for themselves with the increased trail camera performance.
This article uses ballistic graphs and tables to show you the differences between the 380 vs. 9mm Velocity, trajectory, energy, and recoil are compared between these two cartridges.
A common question for people looking to buy their first handgun is what’s better a 9mm or 380? Let’s jump into the tables and graphs so you can see exactly the pros and cons of each cartridge:
Table of Contents
How To Use This Article
I used similar grain bullets (95 vs 115 gr) for the two cartridges for a more apples-to-apples comparison.
The Ballistic Tables
If you want a 1-on-1 comparison table comparison from 0 to 100 yards in 25-yard increments for any of these ballistics, you can find that after the graphs in the ballistic tables section.
The Ballistic Graphs
Keep in mind that with different bullet grains, you will get slightly different results than shown below. But you can use the information below to determine the potential of each caliber.
Let’s jump into the graphs first because they’ll answer your broader questions faster.
380 vs 9mm Bullet Velocity Ballistic Comparison Graph
From the graph below you can see that the 9mm, even with a heavier 115-grain bullet is faster by 200 fps at the muzzle. The speed does drop off faster with the 9mm at first, but at about 40 yards it loses velocity at about the same rate as the 380. After about 40 yards there is about 135 fps difference. So how does velocity affect the bullet trajectory of these rounds? Let’s move onto the next graph.
380 vs 9mm Bullet Trajectory Ballistic Comparison Graph
You can see that the higher speed of the 9mm gives it a flatter trajectory than the 380. Though the difference here is pretty marginal until you get to about 100 yards. Other than that you’re talking just a couple of inches. So was the extra velocity in the 9mm worth it then? Let’s jump to the bullet energy graph next.
380 vs 9mm Bullet Energy Ballistic Comparison Graph
Energy = 1/2​ × mass × velocity2. Since the 9mm bullet is heavier and faster, it has an advantage over the 380 when it comes to bullet energy. Similarly to the velocity, within 40 yards the 9mm has much more energy, around 140 ft-lbs more. After 40 yards the difference in energy retention remains about the same, with the 9mm having about 100 ft-lbs more energy.Â
From 0 to 100 yards, the 380 has 172.6 ft-lbs of energy on average whereas the 9mm has 288 ft-lbs, a difference of 115.4 or on average the 9mm is 67% more powerful. For self-defense, this makes a difference.
But if it’s more powerful does it have more recoil? Let’s move on to the recoil graph.
380 vs 9mm Recoil Comparison Graph
Recoil is interesting when it comes to handguns because there are more factors than just the cartridge. For example, in the graph below you will see a Glock 42 (.380) vs a Glock 43X (9mm), these two guns have marginal differences in recoil. This is because of the weight of the two guns (16 oz vs 23 oz). By using a slightly heavier 9mm handgun you can lower the recoil energy and velocity.
I also included a 9mm handgun that is the same weight as the 16 oz 380 for an apples-to-apples comparison. You can see that in an identical handgun (same weight), the 9mm is more than double the recoil energy and has much more recoil velocity than the 380.
380 vs 9mm Bullet Velocity Ballistic Comparison Table
From the table below you can see that the 9mm has more velocity from 0 to 100 yards. It has a 200 fps difference in velocity at the muzzle and a 126 fps difference at 100 yards.
380 vs 9mm Bullet Trajectory Ballistic Comparison Table
From the table below you can see that the 9mm has less bullet drop from 0 to 100 yards even with a heavier bullet. However, there is not much difference in drop until about 100 yards. You’re only having a few inches difference in drop out to 75 yards. Most people don’t need a handgun to shoot 100 yards.
380 vs 9mm Bullet Energy Ballistic Comparison Table
From the table below you can see the 9mm has much more energy than the 380. From 0 to 100 yards, the 380 has 172.6 ft-lbs of energy on average whereas the 9mm has 288 ft-lbs, a difference of 115.4, or the 9mm is 67% more powerful on average.
380 vs 9mm Recoil Comparison Ballistic Table
I would refer to the recoil graph for the best information on recoil in this article. However, you can see in this table how handgun weight affects recoil energy and velocity. You can get a 9mm that recoils similar to a 380 just by increasing the weight of the handgun. It’s up to you to decide the trade-off of weight vs recoil.
380 vs 9mm Final Thoughts
The 9mm is better than the 380 in every way ballistically except recoil. But even then, you might just opt for a heavier 9mm handgun which would make the 9mm feel more like a 380.
There are perks to the smaller 380 rounds. For example, smaller handguns for concealment, ease of use, more bullets in a clip…etc. However, there are great 9mm options that do well in these categories.
It’s up to you to decide if the additional ballistic performance is worth the recoil.
Let’s explore the 338 Win Mag vs 5 other popular cartridges using ballistic tables and graphs out to 500 yards. 338 Win Mag’s velocity, trajectory, energy, wind drift, and recoil are compared to all 5 cartridges providing a clear and data-driven perspective on how the 338 Win Mag stacks up.
With new cartridges coming onto the market, it is interesting to see how this tried and true cartridge still stacks up. It’s also nice to be able to visualize how the 338 Win Mag compares to other traditional cartridges.
In this article, the 338 Win Mag (200 gr) is compared side-by-side with the:
338 Lapua Magnum (250 gr)
300 Win Mag (220 gr)
30-06 Springfield (180 gr)
308 Winchester (180 gr)
300 PRC (225 gr)
Table of Contents
How To Use This Blog Post:
The Ballistic Graphs
I used similar grain bullets for most cartridges (180-200 gr) for many of the cartridges. I chose to use 250-gr bullets for the 338 Win Mag for a more apples-to-apples comparison to the 250-gr 338 Lapua Magnum.
Keep in mind that with different bullet grains, you will get slightly different results than shown below. But you can use the information below to determine the potential of each caliber.
The Ballistic Tables
If you want a 1 on 1 comparison of each cartridge to the 338 Win Mag, you can find that in the Graph Summary (after the graphs), this is where you’ll find the ballistic tables.
Let’s jump into the graphs first because they’ll answer your broader questions fastest:
Velocity Comparison Graph: 338 Win Mag vs Popular Cartridges
Below are velocity ballistic graphs of all 6 cartridges. The 338 Win Mag is shown as a black line.
338 Win Mag Velocity vs Popular Cartridges
Trajectory Comparison Graph: 338 Win Mag vs Popular Cartridges
Below are trajectory ballistic graphs of all 6 cartridges. The 338 Win Mag is shown as a black line.
338 Win Mag Trajectory vs Popular Cartridges
Bullet Energy Comparison Graph: 338 Win Mag vs Popular Cartridges
Below are bullet energy ballistic graphs of all 6 cartridges. The 338 Win Mag is shown as a black line.
338 Win Mag Bullet Energy vs Popular Cartridges
Wind Drift Comparison Graph: 338 Win Mag vs Popular Cartridges
Below are wind drift ballistic graphs of all 6 cartridges. The 338 Win Mag is shown as a black line.
Recoil Comparison Graph: 338 Win Mag vs Popular Cartridges
Below is a recoil graph, the red dotted linesshow the recoil energy and recoil velocity of the 338 Win Mag compared to the other popular cartridges.
Summary of Graphs: 338 Win Mag vs Popular Cartridges
338 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua Magnum
The .338 Winchester Magnum (338 Win Mag) and the .338 Lapua Magnum (338 Lapua) are two of the most formidable cartridges but they serve slightly different roles. Let’s compare these two powerhouses across key ballistic aspects.
Velocity
338 Win Mag (250 gr): Pushing a 250 gr .338 caliber round it still offers 2660 fps muzzle velocity.
338 Lapua (250 gr): With the same 250 gr bullet, the 338 Lapua has 2950 fps muzzle velocity, a 290 fps difference. At 500 yards the 338 Lapua has 468 fps more velocity showing the 338 Lapua maintains its velocity better than the 338 Win Mag.
Trajectory
338 Win Mag (250 gr): The 250 gr 338 Win Mag offers a fairly flat trajectory but the 338 Lapula cartridge shoots much flatter with the same grain bullet.
338 Lapua (250 gr): The 338 Lapua has a flatter trajectory, even a 200 gr 338 Win Mag bullet doesn’t have as flat of a trajectory as the 338 Lapua, although it is much closer. At 500 yards the 338 Lapua has 15.7-inches less drop.
Energy
338 Win Mag (250 gr): Delivers substantial energy, 3927 ft-lbs at the muzzle but because it’s such a heavy bullet for this cartridge it drops off fast. Although it still has plenty of energy to ethically kill big game at 500 yards. It does not deal nearly the same energy as the 338 Lapua Magnum.
338 Lapua (250 gr): The Lapua has exceptionally high bullet energy – 4830 ft-lbs at the muzzle which is 903 ft-lbs more than the 338 Win Mag. Not only that, but it maintains 2685 ft-lbs at 500 yards, 1022 ft-lbs more than the 338 Win Mag. This is largely due to the cartridge being bigger in every way. Both cartridges lose their energy at about the same rate with a slight advantage to the 338 Lapua.
Wind Drift
338 Win Mag (250 gr): Does alright with wind drift, but not as good as the 338 Lapua.
338 Lapua (250 gr): Outstanding performance in wind drift due to its high ballistic coefficient bullets. This cartridge is known for its ability to remain stable and accurate in challenging wind conditions, outperforming the 338 Win Mag at all ranges. At 500 yards it has 9.7-inches less wind drift than the 338 Win Mag.
Recoil
338 Win Mag (250 gr): The 338 Win Mag has 44.49 ft-lbs of recoil, which is significant, but still not nearly as much as the 338 Lapua.
338 Lapua (250 gr): This cartridge has 65.47 ft-lbs of recoil, meaning it has 47% more recoil than the 338 Win Mag. It has the most powerful recoil of any cartridge in this comparison. This substantial recoil requires careful management and can be challenging, particularly for less experienced shooters.
The 338 Win Mag provides an excellent balance of velocity, trajectory, and energy with manageable recoil, making it suitable for a broad range of hunting and shooting applications. The 338 Lapua, is superior in every category except recoil. With its superior energy delivery and wind drift performance, is ideal for the most challenging long-range shooting scenarios, including large game hunting and precision shooting at extreme distances, but comes at the cost of heavy recoil.
338 Win Mag vs 300 Win Mag
Comparing the .300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) with the .338 Winchester Magnum (338 Win Mag) brings us to a discussion of two very capable cartridges. While the 300 Win Mag is revered for its versatility and long-range precision, the 338 Win Mag is known for its formidable stopping power and larger caliber. Let’s delve into a detailed comparison of these two cartridges across various ballistic parameters. If you’re looking for a more apples-to-apples comparison of these cartridges with similar bullet grain weights you can find that here: 300 Win Mag vs 13 Popular Cartridges (Ballistic Tables & Graphs).
Velocity
338 Win Mag (250 gr): Has a muzzle velocity of 2660 fps with a 250 gr bullet, a 150 fps difference. So it pushes a +50 gr bullet only slightly slower than the 300 Win Mag.
300 Win Mag (200 gr): That said, the 300 Win Mag maintains its energy at longer ranges better. At 500 yards the 300 Win Mag is 374 fps faster.
Trajectory
338 Win Mag (250 gr): This cartridge has 52.8-inches of bullet drop at 500 yards, an 11.7-inch difference. This is largely due to the bigger bullet, a comparable bullet grain would fly similarly to the 300 Win Mag.
300 Win Mag (200 gr): There’s not much difference in trajectory until past 300 yards, this is when the 300 Win Mag shows its colors.
Energy
338 Win Mag (250 gr): Delivers substantial energy, 3927 ft-lbs at the muzzle, which is over 421 ft-lbs more. That said, because of the heavy bullet the energy dies off fast. The 338 Win Mag is more powerful at closer ranges within about 220 yards in this cartridge.
300 Win Mag (200 gr): At 500 yards, the 300 Win Mag has 1967 ft-lbs vs the 338 Win Mag’s 1664 ft-lbs has 3812 ft-lbs, a difference of 303 ft-lbs. This shows the 338 Win Mag is a more powerful option past 220 yards with this lighter bullet.
Wind Drift
338 Win Mag (250 gr): This cartridge has 23.9-inches of wind drift at 500 yards, a difference of 9.1-inches.
300 Win Mag (200 gr): At 500 yards this cartridge has 14.8-inches of wind drift. The smaller, lighter, faster bullets have less wind drift.
Recoil
338 Win Mag (250 gr): Has 44.49 ft-lbs of recoil, which is 19% more recoil than the 300 Win Mag.
300 Win Mag (200 gr): The 300 Win Mag has 36.01 ft-lbs of recoil, but it is less than the 338 Win Mag.
This heavier grain bullet for the 338 Win Mag is more powerful within 220 yards, I think this is where this cartridge shines. However, the 338 Win Mag can throw a 200-grain bullet the same as the 300 Win Mag can throw a 180-grain bullet with a larger diameter hole. The question is – is the increase in recoil worth it?
338 Win Mag vs 30-06 Springfield
When comparing two legendary cartridges like the .338 Winchester Magnum (338 Win Mag) and the .30-06 Springfield, there’s a rich history and a wealth of ballistic data to consider. Both cartridges have proven their worth in various shooting disciplines, but how do they stack up against each other? Let’s examine their performance in terms of bullet velocity, trajectory, energy, wind drift, and recoil. my article 30-06 vs 9 Most Popular Rifle Cartridges (with Ballistic Graphs) compares the 30-06 Springfield against more cartridges.
Velocity
338 Win Mag (250 gr): Has a starting muzzle velocity of around 2660 fps, which is slightly slower than the 30-06 Springfield, however, the 338 Win Mag retains its speed at longer distances better. At about 165 yards the 338 Win Mag has a higher velocity. Remember, though, that the 338 Win Mag does this while having a 70-grain heavier bullet.
30-06 Springfield (180 gr): The 180-grain bullet has a muzzle velocity of 2700 fps, overall the two cartridges have very similar velocity ballistics out to 500 yards.
Trajectory
338 Win Mag (250 gr): Offers a slightly flatter trajectory, but overall has an almost identical trajectory to the 30-06 Springfield out to 500 yards. Only about of inch or difference at 100 yards.
30-06 Springfield (180 gr): The 180 gr 30-06 Springfield trajectory is almost identical to a 250 gr 338 Win Mag.
Energy
338 Win Mag (250 gr): Bullet energy is where the 338 Win Mag shines vs the 30-06 Springfield. It has just over 1000 ft-lbs more energy at the muzzle. It does lose its energy faster than the 30-06, but it still has 553 more ft-lbs energy at 500 yards.
30-06 Springfield (180 gr): Produces good energy levels (2913- ft-lbs at the muzzle) but falls short of the 338 Win Mag out to 500 yards. That said, the margin between energy at further falls. For example, at the muzzle, there is over 1000 ft-lbs difference, but at 500 yards there is only a 555 ft-lbs difference, meaning the 30-06 Springfield retains its energy better.
Wind Drift
338 Win Mag (250 gr): Shows better resistance to wind drift, at 500 yards there are 23.9-inches of wind drift.
30-06 Springfield (180 gr): More affected by wind, requiring the shooter to compensate more for windage at longer distances. The difference is not substantial, it’s only about a 3-inch difference at 500 yards.
Recoil
338 Win Mag (250 gr): The recoil energy is 44.49 ft-lbs which is notably higher recoil than the 30-06 Springfield.
30-06 Springfield (180 gr): Offers moderate recoil (26.50 ft-lbs), almost 20 ft-lbs lighter or about 40% less recoil which is substantial.
In summary, the 338 Win Mag generally surpasses the 30-06 Springfield in velocity, trajectory, energy, and wind drift resistance, making it a superior choice. The biggest advantage of the 338 Win Mag va the 30-06 Springfield is energy. On the other hand, the 30-06 Springfield, with its more manageable recoil and still respectable ballistic performance, remains a versatile and popular choice among hunters and shooters.
338 Win Mag vs 308 Winchester
The 338 Winchester Magnum (338 Win Mag) and the 308 Winchester (308 Win) are another topic of interest. Let’s dive into the analysis of these two cartridges, examining their performance in terms of bullet velocity, trajectory, energy, wind drift, and recoil.
Velocity
338 Win Mag (250 gr): Starts with a faster muzzle velocity of 2660 feet per second (fps), but not by much. The speed is maintained better over distance than the 308 Win too.
308 Winchester (180 gr): Begins at a lower velocity of 2570 fps. The velocity of the 308 slows at about the same rate as the 338 Win Mag, there is only about a 150 fps difference from 0 to 500 yards.
Trajectory
338 Win Mag (250 gr): The 338 Win Mag maintains a flatter trajectory from 0 to 500 yards. At 500 yards 33 Win Mag has 7.9-inches less drop.
308 Winchester (180 gr): Exhibits a more bullet drop, more evident at ranges around 400+ yards. This necessitates greater compensation for bullet drop when engaging distant targets, which can be challenging for long-range precision hunting and shooting.
Energy
338 Win Mag (250 gr): The 3927 ft-lbs of muzzle velocity devastates the 308 Win. This high energy translates to much greater stopping power and effectiveness on larger game, as well as improved terminal ballistics at extended ranges.
308 Winchester (180 gr): Starts with 2640 ft-lbs of energy out of the muzzle, which is a 1286-ft lbs difference. The margin does shrink over distance since the 308 maintains energy better. However, it still cannot compete with the 338 Win Mag in terms of energy.
Wind Drift
338 Win Mag (250 gr): The 338 Win Mag has less wind drift at each distance.
308 Winchester (180 gr): More susceptible to wind drift. Shooters using the 308 Win must account for greater windage adjustments, especially under windy conditions and at longer ranges. There is 5.5 inches of difference in wind drift between the two cartridges at 500 yards.
Recoil
338 Win Mag (250 gr): Notably, it has a higher recoil (44.49 ft-lbs) compared to the 308 Winchester.
308 Winchester (180 gr): Offers WAY better recoil (19.77 ft-lbs), about 56% less recoil. The 308 Winchester has the best recoil of all calibers in this article.
In summary, the 338 Win Mag offers superior performance in terms of velocity, trajectory, energy, and resistance to wind drift, making it an excellent choice for hunting big game. However, this comes at the cost of much more recoil. The 308 Winchester, while not matching the long-range capabilities of the 338 Win Mag, offers a more comfortable shooting experience with much less recoil.
338 Win Mag vs 300 PRC
The .338 Winchester Magnum (338 Win Mag) and the .300 Precision Rifle Cartridge (300 PRC) are two high-performance cartridges that have garnered attention in the shooting world for their impressive capabilities. Let’s see how they stack up.
Velocity
338 Win Mag (250 gr): The 250-grain bullet has a much slower initial muzzle velocity starting at 2660 fps.
300 PRC (190 gr): Boasts a faster muzzle velocity of 3000 fps which is a difference of 340 fps. It’s also more efficient and maintains its energy better. For example, at 500 yards the 300 PRC has a 498 fps difference in speed.
Trajectory
338 Win Mag (250 gr): Offers a relatively flat trajectory, but it not nearly as flat as the 300 PRC. The slower speeds of the larger bullet don’t help its trajectory.
300 PRC (190 gr): Engineered specifically for long-range shooting, it provides a very flat trajectory. Its advanced bullet design and optimized case capacity allow for efficient flight dynamics, exceeding the trajectory performance of the 338 Win Mag.
Energy
338 Win Mag (250 gr): The 3927 ft-lbs of muzzle energy beats the 300 PRC, but who cares because at about 75 yards the 300 PRC quickly takes the lead.
300 PRC (190 gr): The 300 PRC’s ability to shoot high-BC bullets efficiently gives it an edge in energy retention, especially at extreme ranges. It has a muzzle energy of 3797 ft-lbs and maintains 2095 ft-lbs out to 500 yards. It has more energy than the 338 Win Mag at 75 yards, and at 500 yards it has 431 ft-lbs more energy which is substantial.
Wind Drift
338 Win Mag (250 gr): Exhibits decent resistance to wind drift, but not as good at the 300 PRC. There is 23.9-inches of wind drift at 500 yards.
300 PRC (190 gr): Its superior aerodynamic efficiency gives it an advantage in wind drift resistance. The 300 PRC’s ability to use very aerodynamic bullets means it can be more predictable and accurate in windy conditions compared to the 338 Win Mag. There is 14.2 inches of wind drift at 500 yards, a 9.7-inch difference.
Recoil
338 Win Mag (250 gr): The 338 Win Mag has a lot of recoil (44.49 ft-lbs), even more than the 300 PRC.
300 PRC (190 gr): Has 39.82 ft-lbs of recoil, which is 10% less recoil than the 338 Win Mag.
The 190 gr 300 PRC outperforms the 250 gr. 338 Win Mag in every category. Additionally, a 200-grain 338 Win Mag bullet competes better but still does not match the performance of the 300 PRC in any of these categories.
Final Thoughts
After researching this cartridge, I found that the 250-grain 338 Win Mag is a powerhouse within 250ish yards. After that, the bullet is so big it starts to not perform as well. Unlike the the 338 Lapua Magnum which is above and beyond all the cartridges in the comparison and can push these bullets exceptionally fast, flat, and powerfully to far distances.
I think a better cartridge would be a 200-grain 338 Win Mag which would perform almost identically to, but slightly better than the 180-grain 300 Win Mag, but with a bigger .338 diameter bullet. This 50-grain drop in bullet weight will allow that 338-caliber bullet to get more speed behind it and have better long-range performance.
If you want to learn more about how the 200-grain 338 Win Mag stacks up against these cartridges and more, check out my article:Â 300 Win Mag vs 13 Popular Cartridges (Ballistic Tables & Graphs). You’ll find the 338 Win Mag in this article and all of the other cartridges that are in this article as well.
I also think there are better cartridges on the market, like the more efficient cartridges. These include options like the 300 PRC and 7 PRC.
Let’s explore the 300 Win Mag vs 13 other popular cartridges using ballistic tables and graphs out to 500 yards. 300 Win Mag’s velocity, trajectory, energy, wind drift, and recoil are compared to all 13 cartridges providing a clear and data-driven perspective on how the 300 Win Mag stacks up.
With new cartridges coming onto the market, it is interesting to see how this tried and true cartridge still stacks up. It’s also nice to be able to visualize how the 300 Win Mag compares to other traditional cartridges.
In this article, the 300 Win Mag is compared side-by-side with the:
308 Win
7mm Rem Mag
30-06 Springfield
300 PRC
6.5 Creedmoor
338 Lapua
300 RUM
28 Nosler
338 Win Mag
6.8 Western
30 Nosler
7mm PRC
300 WSM
Table of Contents
How To Use This Blog Post:
The Ballistic Graphs
I used similar grain bullets for most cartridges (175-200 gr) when possible so it would be the best apples-to-apples comparison. Some of the smaller calibers don’t make bullets that big so I used a common bullet grain for those cartridges. Some of the larger calibers in this comparison don’t make bullets that small so I also used a common bullet grain for those cartridges as well.
I also broke the graphs out into three groups, and compared the 300 Win Mag to all three:
Smaller than 30 Caliber Group
30 Caliber Group
Larger than 30 Caliber Group
This was beneficial to see the graphs, otherwise, there were too many lines on a single graph.
Keep in mind that with different bullet grains, you will get slightly different results than shown below. But you can use the information below to determine the potential of each caliber.
The Ballistic Tables
If you want a 1 on 1 comparison of each cartridge to the 300 Win Mag, you can find that in the Graph Summary (after the graphs), this is where you’ll find the ballistic tables.
Let’s jump into the graphs first because they’ll answer your broader questions fastest:
Velocity Comparison Graph: 300 Win Mag vs Popular Cartridges
Below are velocity ballistic graphs of all 14 cartridges separated into the previously mentioned three groups. The 300 Win Mag is compared in all three graphs and it is shown as a black line in all graphs.
Trajectory Comparison Graph: 300 Win Mag vs Popular Cartridges
Below are trajectory ballistic graphs of all 14 cartridges separated into the previously mentioned three groups. The 300 Win Mag is compared in all three graphs and it is shown as a black line in all graphs.
Bullet Energy Comparison Graph: 300 Win Mag vs Popular Cartridges
Below are bullet energy ballistic graphs of all 14 cartridges separated into the previously mentioned three groups. The 300 Win Mag is compared in all three graphs and it is shown as a black line in all graphs.
Wind Drift Comparison Graph: 300 Win Mag vs Popular Cartridges
Below are wind drift ballistic graphs of all 14 cartridges separated into the previously mentioned three groups. The 300 Win Mag is compared in all three graphs and it is shown as a black line in all graphs.
Assumes a 10 mph crosswind*
Recoil Comparison Graph: 300 Win Mag vs Popular Cartridges
Below is a recoil graph that is not separated into the previously mentioned three groups, instead it contains all of the cartridges in this one graph. The red dotted lineshows the recoil energy of the 300 Win Mag compared to the other popular cartridges. Recoil velocity is also shown for each cartridge.
All recoil values for each cartridge were calculated using a 7 lbs rifle for consistency*Â
Ballistic Tables: 300 Win Mag vs Popular Cartridges
300 Win Mag vs 308 Winchester
In the world of long-range hunting and shooting, the comparison between the 300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) and the 308 Winchester (308 Win) is a topic of much interest. Let’s delve into a detailed analysis of these two cartridges, examining their performance in terms of bullet velocity, trajectory, energy, wind drift, and recoil.
Velocity
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Starts with a muzzle velocity of 2960 feet per second (fps), which is significantly higher than the 308 Win. This high initial speed is maintained over greater distances, providing the 300 Win Mag with superior long-range capabilities.
308 Winchester (180 gr): Begins at a lower velocity of 2570 fps. The velocity of the 308 slows at about the same rate as the 300 Win Mag, there is about a 400 fps difference in speed from 0 to 500 yards.
Trajectory
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Known for its flatter trajectory, the 300 Win Mag maintains a more consistent path over longer distances.
308 Winchester (180 gr): Exhibits a more pronounced bullet drop, especially evident at ranges beyond 300 yards. This necessitates greater compensation for bullet drop when engaging distant targets, which can be challenging for long-range precision hunting and shooting.
Energy
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Delivers higher energy throughout its flight path, starting from a superior muzzle energy of 3502 ft-lbs. This high energy translates to greater stopping power and effectiveness on larger game, as well as improved terminal ballistics at extended ranges.
308 Winchester (180 gr): Starts with 2640 ft-lbs of energy out of the muzzle, which is almost 1000-ft lbs difference. While still effective for large-sized game, it falls short in terms of stopping power compared to the 300 Win Mag, especially at long distances.
Wind Drift
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The cartridge’s higher velocity results in less wind drift, making it more resilient to crosswinds. This aspect is crucial in long-range hunting and shooting, where even slight wind variations can significantly impact the bullet’s path.
308 Winchester (180 gr): More susceptible to wind drift due to its lower velocity and ballistic coefficient. Shooters using the 308 Win must account for greater windage adjustments, especially under windy conditions and at longer ranges. There is about 10 inches of difference in wind drift between the two cartridges at 500 yards.
The calculation assumes 10 mph crosswind*
Recoil
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Notably, it has a higher recoil (35.08 ft-lbs) compared to the 308 Winchester.
308 Winchester (180 gr): Offers WAY better recoil (19.77 ft-lbs), about 44% less recoil. The 308 Winchester has the second-best recoil of all calibers on this list.
Calculated Assuming 7 lbs Rifle*
In summary, the 300 Win Mag offers superior performance in terms of velocity, trajectory, energy, and resistance to wind drift, making it an excellent choice for long-range shooting and hunting big game. However, this comes at the cost of increased recoil. The 308 Winchester, while not matching the long-range capabilities of the 300 Win Mag, offers a more comfortable shooting experience with less recoil, making it suitable for a wider range of hunters and shooters.
300 Win Mag vs 7mm Rem Mag
The .300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) and the 7mm Remington Magnum (7mm Rem Mag) are both popular choices among long-range shooters and hunters, each offering unique ballistic characteristics. Let’s compare the bullet velocity, trajectory, energy, wind drift, and recoil of these cartridges.
Velocity
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The 300 Win Mag is superior to the 7mm Rem Mag when it comes to velocity, but not by much. It maintains exactly 100 fps faster velocity from 0-500 yards. It starts off with a high muzzle velocity of 2960 fpsÂ
7mm Rem Mag (175 gr): The 7mm Rem Mag also exhibits high muzzle velocity (2860 fps). Although slightly lower than the 300 Win Mag, it’s still a fast cartridge.
Trajectory
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Known for its flat trajectory, the 300 Win Mag is less affected by gravity over distance. This characteristic contributes to easier shot placement and less need for elevation compensation at extended ranges.
7mm Rem Mag (175 gr): Also offers a flat trajectory but has 3.6 inches more drop at 500 yards, this is a negligible difference. The 7mm Rem Mag is often praised for its long-range capabilities, and while it might have slightly more drop than the 300 Win Mag, it’s still an excellent choice for long-range hunting and shooting.
Energy
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Delivers impressive energy, with 3502 ft-lbs at the muzzle and 1570 ft-lbs at 500 yards.
7mm Rem Mag (175 gr): This cartridge, with less energy from 0-500 yards, its close to the 300 Win Mag. It has 3178 ft-lbs at the muzzle and 1377 ft-lbs at 500 yards. It has about 200 ft-lbs lower in energy than the 300 Win Mag from 0-500 yards.
Wind Drift
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The 300 Win Mag again just barely beats the 7mm Rem Mag in this category. There is almost no difference, at 500 yards the 300 Win Mag will have 20-inches of wind drift with a 10 mph crosswind.
7mm Rem Mag (175 gr): This cartridge has 21.4-inches of wind drift at 500 yards (only 1.4 inches more than the 300 Win Mag). This means you will virtually not be able to tell the difference, especially within 500 yards.
The calculation assumes 10 mph crosswind*
Recoil
300 Win Mag (180 gr): It has higher recoil (35.08 ft-lbs) compared to the 7mm Rem Mag. The question to ask would be; is the extra recoil worth the marginal difference in performance to you?
7mm Rem Mag (175 gr): Milder recoil (28.69 ft-lbs) compared to the 300 Win Mag. Although its performance is slightly worse than the 300 Win Mag, its recoil is 6.39 ft-lbs lighter by 18.7%, which is a lot.
Calculated Assuming 7 lbs Rifle*
In conclusion, both the 300 Win Mag and the 7mm Rem Mag are outstanding choices for long-range hunting and shooting. The 300 Win Mag leads in velocity, energy, and wind drift resistance. However, the fast, smaller diameter bullet of the 7mm Rem Mag, with its milder recoil, offers a balance of power and comfort, suitable to hunt anything the 300 Win Mag is capable of.
300 Win Mag vs 30-06 Springfield
When comparing two legendary cartridges like the .300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) and the .30-06 Springfield, there’s a rich history and a wealth of ballistic data to consider. Both cartridges have proven their worth in various shooting disciplines, but how do they stack up against each other? Let’s examine their performance in terms of bullet velocity, trajectory, energy, wind drift, and recoil. You might like my 30-06 vs 9 Most Popular Rifle Cartridges (with Ballistic Graphs) article.
Velocity
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Boasts a starting muzzle velocity of around 2960 fps, which gives it an edge in maintaining speed over longer distances. This high velocity is crucial for reducing bullet drop and time to target, especially in long-range shooting scenarios. The 300 Win Mag maintains about a 300 fps advantage over the 30-06 from 0-500 yards.
30-06 Springfield (180 gr): Typically fires at a lower velocity, around 2700 fps. While this is still respectable, the lower velocity means the bullet will take longer to reach the target and will drop more over the same distance.
Trajectory
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Offers a flatter trajectory thanks to its higher velocity and ballistic efficiency. This advantage becomes more apparent at ranges beyond 300 yards, where the trajectory remains more consistent, making long-range shooting more predictable.
30-06 Springfield (180 gr): Exhibits more bullet drop at extended ranges, requiring more elevation adjustment from the shooter. While still an effective cartridge at long ranges, it demands more calculation for accurate shot placement.
Energy
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Delivers superior energy on impact, starting with higher muzzle energy (3502 ft-lbs) and maintaining it over longer distances. This high energy transfer makes the 300 Win Mag particularly effective for larger game hunting and in situations where stopping power is paramount. The 300 Win Mag has about 500 ft-lbs more energy from 0-500 yards, which is a big difference.
30-06 Springfield (180 gr): Produces good energy levels (2913- ft-lbs at the muzzle) but falls short of the 300 Win Mag, especially at longer ranges. It’s still a very capable cartridge for medium to large game but might not be as effective for the largest game or in long-range hunting scenarios.
Wind Drift
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Shows better resistance to wind drift, a byproduct of its higher velocity and advanced bullet design. At 500 yards the 300 Win Mag has 20-inches of deflection.
30-06 Springfield (180 gr): More affected by wind, requiring the shooter to compensate more for windage at longer distances. Its slower velocity and ballistic profile make it more susceptible to wind drift compared to the 300 Win Mag. That said, there’s not much of a difference until you’re shooting over 300 yards. At 500 Yards the 30-06 has 27-inches of wind deflection.
The calculation assumes 10 mph crosswind*
Recoil
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The recoil energy is 35.08 ft-lbs which is notably higher recoil than the 30-06 Springfield.
30-06 Springfield (180 gr): Offers moderate recoil (26.50 ft-lbs), almost 10 ft-lbs lighter or about 24.5% less recoil which is substantial.
Calculated Assuming 7 lbs Rifle*
In summary, the 300 Win Mag surpasses the 30-06 Springfield in terms of velocity, trajectory, energy, and wind drift resistance, making it a superior choice for long-range hunting and shooting, especially for big game. However, its significant recoil can be a drawback for some shooters. On the other hand, the 30-06 Springfield, with its more manageable recoil and still respectable ballistic performance, remains a versatile and popular choice among hunters and shooters.
300 Win Mag vs 300 PRC
The .300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) and the .300 Precision Rifle Cartridge (300 PRC) are two high-performance cartridges that have garnered attention in the shooting world for their impressive long-range capabilities. Let’s compare these two .300 caliber giants across the various ballistic parameters to see how they measure up.
Velocity
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Its high initial velocity starts around 2960 fps. This speed is a significant factor in the cartridge’s long-range performance, allowing the bullet to travel faster and hit the target more quickly.
300 PRC (190 gr): Boasts a faster (3000 fps) but very comparable muzzle velocity to the 300 Win Mag. It’s designed to maintain velocity over long distances, losing less energy than the 300 Win Mag.
Trajectory
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Offers a relatively flat trajectory, thanks to its high velocity and efficient bullet design. This results in less bullet drop at longer ranges, which is advantageous for precision shooting. The 300 Win Mag has about 5-inches more drop at 500 yards, not a significant difference, but notable.
300 PRC (190 gr): Engineered specifically for long-range shooting, it provides a very flat trajectory. Its advanced bullet design and optimized case capacity allow for efficient flight dynamics, exceeding the trajectory performance of the 300 Win Mag.
Energy
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The 3502 ft-lbs, although a lot of muzzle energy is notably less than the 300 PRC and does not retain its energy as well at distance, with only 1570 ft-lbs at 500 yards, a 500 ft-lbs difference.
300 PRC (190 gr): Designed to maximize ballistic potential, it also produces high downrange energy. The 300 PRC’s ability to shoot heavier, high-BC bullets efficiently gives it an edge in energy retention, especially at extreme ranges. It has a muzzle energy of 3797 ft-lbs and maintains 2095 ft-lbs out to 500 yards.
Wind Drift
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Exhibits good resistance to wind drift, but not as good at the 300 PRC. There is 20-inches of wind drift at 500 yards.
300 PRC (190 gr): Its superior aerodynamic efficiency gives it an advantage in wind drift resistance. The 300 PRC’s ability to use very aerodynamic bullets means it can be more predictable and accurate in windy conditions compared to the 300 Win Mag. There is 14.2 inches of wind drift at 500 yards, almost a 6-inch difference.
The calculation assumes 10 mph crosswind*
Recoil
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The 300 Win Mag has a lot of recoil (35.08 ft-lbs), but not as much as the 300 PRC.
300 PRC (190 gr): Has significant recoil (39.82 ft-lbs), which is 13.5% more recoil. Due to its design for shooting heavy, high-BC bullets, the recoil can be stout, requiring proper shooting technique and recoil management strategies. Is the extra performance over the 300 Win Mag worth it for you?
Calculated Assuming 7 lbs Rifle*
In conclusion, both the 300 Win Mag and 300 PRC are exceptional cartridges. Both cartridges deliver powerful energy and flat trajectories but come with substantial recoil. The 300 PRC outperforms the 300 Win Mag in velocity, trajectory, energy, and wind drift but it comes at the cost of more recoil.
300 Win Mag vs 6.5 Creedmoor
In the realm of long-range shooting, the comparison between the .300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) and the 6.5 Creedmoor often sparks interest due to their contrasting characteristics. The 300 Win Mag is known for its raw power and long-range capabilities, while the 6.5 Creedmoor has gained immense popularity for its precision and shooter-friendly attributes. Let’s delve into their ballistic performances across various aspects.
Velocity
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Boasts a high muzzle velocity around 2960 fps. This superior speed and bigger bullet aids in longer effective range and better performance at long distances. At 500 yards the 300 Win Mag maintains 1982 fps.
6.5 Creedmoor (140 gr): Typically offers a lower velocity, usually around 2725 fps for a 140 gr bullet. While it may not match the raw speed of the 300 Win Mag, it compensates with excellent ballistic coefficients, which helps maintain velocity over longer distances. For example, at the muzzle, there is a 235 fps difference but the 6.5 Creedmoor closes the distance at longer ranges. At 500 Yards the 6.5 Creedmoor is 1796 fps, which is only a 186 fps difference.
Trajectory
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Exhibits a flatter trajectory, especially noticeable at ranges beyond 300 yards. This flatness aids in more straightforward shot placement with less need for elevation adjustments. At 500 yards there are 41-inches of bullet drop.
6.5 Creedmoor (140 gr): Known for its efficient trajectory, it offers a relatively flat path, thanks to its high ballistic coefficients. However, it will have slightly more drop than the 300 Win Mag at extreme ranges. At 500 yards, there are 48.4-inches of bullet drop, so 7.4-inches of difference. 300 yards and under, there’s only about an inch or less in difference.
Energy
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Delivers substantial energy, 3502 ft-lbs at the muzzle, and maintains its energy pretty well at distance with 1570 ft-lbs at 500 yards.
6.5 Creedmoor (140 gr): Although the velocity and trajectory of the 6.5 is near the 300 Win Mag, the bullet energy is where the 300 Win Mag pulls ahead in performance. At the muzzle, the 6.5 Creedmoor has 2308 ft-lbs of energy (1194 ft-lbs difference). That said, the 6.5 closes the gap at longer ranges with 1003 ft-lbs at 500 yards (567 ft-lbs difference). Although the 300 Win Mag is still significantly more powerful at 500 yards, the 6.5 Creedmoor closes the gap by 47% compared to the muzzle energy.
Wind Drift
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Exhibits good resistance to wind drift, but only slightly better than the 6.5 Creedmoor. At 300 Yards there is 6.6-inches drift and at 500 yards there is 20-inches of drift.
6.5 Creedmoor (140 gr): Excels in wind drift performance, as its high ballistic coefficient bullets cut through the wind effectively. This trait is one of the key reasons for its popularity in long-range precision shooting. It competes closely with the 300 Win Mag, but the 300 Win Mag does have less wind drift overall. For example, at 300 yards there is 7.5-inches (1.1-inches difference) of drift at 500 yards there is 22.5-inches of wind drift (2.5-inches of difference).
The calculation assumes 10 mph crosswind*
Recoil
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The 300 Win Mag has a lot of recoil (35.08 ft-lbs), which is significantly more than the 6.5 Creedmoor.
6.5 Creedmoor (140 gr): This cartridge has the least recoil of all rifles Renowned for its mild recoil (15.49 ft-lbs), which is 56% less recoil than the 300 Win Mag.
Calculated Assuming 7 lbs Rifle*
In conclusion, the 300 Win Mag and the 6.5 Creedmoor cater to different needs in the shooting world. The 300 Win Mag stands out for its power and extended-range capabilities, making it a go-to for large game hunting and long-range shooting. The 6.5 Creedmoor, on the other hand, is celebrated for its accuracy, efficient ballistics, and shooter-friendly nature, making it a favorite among precision shooters and those looking for a more manageable recoil profile.
300 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua Magnum
The .300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) and the .338 Lapua Magnum (338 Lapua) are two of the most formidable cartridges in long-range shooting. Both have a storied history and a reputation for exceptional performance, but they serve slightly different roles in the world of precision shooting and hunting. Let’s compare these two powerhouses across key ballistic aspects.
Velocity
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Known for a high muzzle velocity of about 2960 fps with a 180 gr bullet, it maintains speed effectively over long distances, which is crucial for long-range accuracy and energy retention.
338 Lapua (250 gr): With a 250 gr bullet, the 338 Lapua almost has the same muzzle velocity compared to the 300 Win Mag (2950 fps), but its heavier bullet retains velocity better.
Trajectory
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The 180 gr 300 Win Mag offers a flat trajectory, it is close to the big 250 gr 338 Lapula cartridge, but is not quite as flat.
338 Lapua (250 gr): Despite being a bigger and much heavier bullet, the 338 Lapua still has a flatter trajectory but not by much. You only notice a difference at about 500 yards. At 300 yards the 338 Lapua has 2-inches less drop, At 500 yards it has 5-inches less drop.
Energy
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Delivers substantial energy, 3502 ft-lbs at the muzzle, and maintains its energy pretty well at distance with 1570 ft-lbs at 500 yards. It does not deal nearly the same energy as the 338 Lapua Magnum, but it does close the distance by 200 ft-lbs at 500 yards.
338 Lapua (250 gr): Although the 300 Win Mag has substantial energy, its nothing compared to the 338 Lapua Magnum. The Lapua has exceptionally high bullet energy – 4830 ft-lbs at the muzzle which is 1328 ft-lbs more than the 300 Win Mag. Not only that, but it maintains 2685 ft-lbs at 500 yards, 1115 ft-lbs more than the 300 Win Mag. This is largely due to the cartridge being bigger in every way.
Wind Drift
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Demonstrates good resistance to wind drift, but not quite as good as the 338 Lapua.
338 Lapua (250 gr): Outstanding performance in wind drift due to its high ballistic coefficient bullets. This cartridge is known for its ability to remain stable and accurate in challenging wind conditions, often outperforming the 300 Win Mag at very long ranges. At 500 yards it has 5.7-inches less wind drift than the 300 Win Mag.
The calculation assumes 10 mph crosswind*
Recoil
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The 300 Win Mag has 35.08 ft-lbs of recoil, which is significant, but not nearly as much as the 338 Lapua.
338 Lapua (250 gr): This cartridge has 65.47 ft-lbs of recoil, meaning it has 87% more recoil than the 300 Win Mag. It has the most powerful recoil of any cartridge in this comparison. This substantial recoil requires careful management and can be challenging, particularly for less experienced shooters.
Calculated Assuming 7 lbs Rifle*
In summary, while both the 300 Win Mag and 338 Lapua offer remarkable long-range capabilities, they excel in different scenarios. The 300 Win Mag provides an excellent balance of velocity, trajectory, and energy with manageable recoil, making it suitable for a broad range of long-range hunting and shooting applications. The 338 Lapua, with its superior energy delivery and wind drift performance, is ideal for the most challenging long-range shooting scenarios, including large game hunting and precision shooting at extreme distances.
300 Win Mag vs 300 RUM
The .300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) and the .300 Remington Ultra Magnum (300 RUM) are both highly respected in the realm of long-range shooting and hunting. While they share the .300 caliber designation, their performances have distinct characteristics. Let’s delve into a detailed comparison of these two cartridges across bullet velocity, trajectory, energy, wind drift, and recoil.
Velocity
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Has an impressive muzzle velocity of 2960 fps, which is faster than the 300 RUM. That said, at around 75 yards the 300 RUM surpasses the velocity of the 300 Win Mag.
300 RUM (220 gr): Can push a 220-grain bullet just about as fast as the 180 gr 300 Win Mag with a muzzle velocity of 2910 fps. Past 75 yards the 300 RUM has an increasingly more velocity.
Trajectory
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Provides a flat trajectory that competes with the 300 RUM but is not as quite as flat. At 500 yards, it has 41-inches of bullet drop.
300 RUM (220 gr): Even with its heavier bullet the 300 RUM has an even flatter trajectory than the 300 Win Mag. At 500 yards, it as 37.2-inches of bullet drop, a difference of only 3.8-inches.
Energy
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Delivers substantial energy, 3502 ft-lbs at the muzzle, and maintains its energy pretty well at distance with 1570 ft-lbs at 500 yards. Even so, it does not have nearly the same energy as the 300 RUM nor does it maintain its energy as well.
300 RUM (220 gr): Offers even higher energy with a heavier bullet weight with similar velocities. At the muzzle, the 300 RUM is producing 4136 ft-lbs of energy which is 634 more ft-lbs than the 300 Win Mag. Additionally, the 300 RUM maintains its energy better with 864 more ft-lbs at 500 yards. At 500 yards it has 2434 ft-lbs of energy, making it the most powerful 30 caliber cartridge in this comparison.
Wind Drift
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Exhibits good resistance to wind drift, but not as good as the 300 RUM. At 500 yards the 300 Win Mag has 20-inches of drift.
300 RUM (220 gr): The higher velocity and potential for heavier, high-BC bullets give the 300 RUM an edge in wind drift resistance. It can maintain a more consistent path in windy conditions, a significant advantage in long-range precision shooting. At 500 yards the 300 RUM only has 12.9-inches of drift, a 7.1-inch difference. The 300 RUM has the least wind drift of any of the 30 calibers in this comparison.
The calculation assumes 10 mph crosswind*
Recoil
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The 300 Win Mag has 35.08 ft-lbs of recoil, which is significant, but it’s much less than the 300 RUM.
300 RUM (220 gr): Has a reputation for recoil, with 57.24 ft-lbs of it. It has 63.2% more recoil than the 300 Win Mag.
Calculated Assuming 7 lbs Rifle*
In conclusion, while both the 300 Win Mag and 300 RUM offer exceptional long-range performance, they cater to slightly different needs. The 300 Win Mag strikes a balance between power, trajectory, and manageable recoil, making it suitable for a wide range of hunting and shooting applications. The 300 RUM, with its superior velocity, flatter trajectory, and higher energy, is ideal for challenging long-range shooting scenarios and for hunters who require maximum downrange performance. However, its significant recoil can be a consideration for many shooters.
300 Win Mag vs 28 Nosler
The .300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) and the 28 Nosler are both celebrated for their long-range shooting capabilities, each offering unique advantages. The 300 Win Mag is renowned for its versatility and power, while the 28 Nosler has gained recognition for its high velocity and flat trajectory. Let’s compare these two cartridges in detail across key ballistic aspects.
Velocity
300 Win Mag (180 gr): This cartridge typically boasts a muzzle velocity of around 2960 fps.
28 Nosler (175 gr): Known for its impressively high muzzle velocity, exceeding the 300 Win Mag, with speeds around 3125 fps for a 175 gr bullet. This increased velocity aids in a longer effective range and improved terminal ballistics.
Trajectory
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Provides a flat trajectory, but not as flat as the 28 Nosler. At 500 yards it has 41-inches of drop.
28 Nosler (175 gr): Offers the flattest trajectory of any cartridge in this comparison. It also outperforms the 300 Win Mag at every range. At 500 yards it only has 31.7-inches of bullet drop, a difference of 9.3-inches.
Energy
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Delivers substantial energy, 3502 ft-lbs at the muzzle, and maintains its energy pretty well at distance with 1570 ft-lbs at 500 yards. Even so, it does not have nearly the same energy as the 28 Nosler nor does it maintain its energy as well.
28 Nosler (175 gr): Generates even higher energy levels than the 300 Win Mag, especially noticeable at longer ranges. It has a muzzle energy of 3794 ft-lbs, a 292 ft-lbs difference. At 500 yards it still maintains a solid 2252 ft-lbs, a 682 ft-lbs difference.
Wind Drift
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Does well in the wind, but not as good as the 28 Nosler. At 500 yards it has 20-inches of wind drift.
28 Nosler (175 gr): Offers excellent capabilities in the wind. It outperforms the 300 Win Mag at every range. At 500 yards it only has 11.7-inches of drift, a difference of 8.3-inches.
The calculation assumes 10 mph crosswind*
Recoil
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The 300 Win Mag has 35.08 ft-lbs of recoil, but it is less than the 28 Nosler.
28 Nosler (175 gr): With 39.17 ft-lbs of recoil, the 28 Nosler has 11.7% more recoil than the 300 Win Mag. Its powerful performance comes with the trade-off of increased kickback. For the small caliber (0.284), it has a lot of recoil.
Calculated Assuming 7 lbs Rifle*
In summary, while both the 300 Win Mag and the 28 Nosler excel in long-range shooting, they cater to different preferences. The 300 Win Mag offers excellent all-around performance and is widely used for its versatility and power. The 28 Nosler, with its higher velocity, flatter trajectory, and superior wind drift resistance, is gaining popularity among long-range shooters and hunters who seek maximum performance at extended ranges. However, both cartridges come with substantial recoil.
300 Win Mag vs 338 Win Mag
Comparing the .300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) with the .338 Winchester Magnum (338 Win Mag) brings us to a discussion of two powerful, long-range capable cartridges. While the 300 Win Mag is revered for its versatility and long-range precision, the 338 Win Mag is known for its formidable stopping power and larger caliber. Let’s delve into a detailed comparison of these two cartridges across various ballistic parameters.
Velocity
300 Win Mag (180 gr): This cartridge typically boasts a muzzle velocity of around 2960 fps.
338 Win Mag (200 gr): Typically, has a muzzle velocity of 2930 fps for a 200 gr bullet, a 30 fps difference. So it can push a +20 gr bullet at the same speed as the 300 Win Mag.
Trajectory
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Again, their trajectories are almost identical, with the 300 Win Mag beating out the 338 Win Mag. At 500 yards the 300 Win Mag has 41-inches of drop.
338 Win Mag (200 gr): This cartridge has 41.8-inches of bullet drop at 500 yards, a marginal 0.8-inch difference.
Energy
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Delivers substantial energy, 3502 ft-lbs at the muzzle, and maintains its energy pretty well at distance with 1570 ft-lbs at 500 yards. Even so, it does not have as much energy as the 338 Win Mag, although it does maintain its energy better at longer distances.
338 Win Mag (200 gr): At the muzzle, it has 3812 ft-lbs of energy, a 310 ft-lbs difference. That said, at 500 yards it only has 1706 ft-lbs of energy, only a 136 ft-lbs difference.
Wind Drift
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Almost identical wild drift values for both the 300 Win Mag and 338 Win Mag from 0 to 500 yards. At 500 yards the 300 Win Mag has 20-inches of wind drift.
338 Win Mag (200 gr): This cartridge has 20.1-inches of wind drift, a difference of only 0.1-inches!
The calculation assumes 10 mph crosswind*
Recoil
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The 300 Win Mag has 35.08 ft-lbs of recoil, but it is less than the 338 Win Mag.
338 Win Mag (200 gr): Has 40.89 ft-lbs of recoil, which is 16.6% more recoil than the 300 Win Mag.
Calculated Assuming 7 lbs Rifle*
In conclusion, both the 300 Win Mag and the 338 Win Mag are outstanding choices for long-range shooting and hunting. The biggest benefit of the 338 Win Mag is that it can throw a 200-grain bullet the same as the 300 Win Mag can throw a 180-grain bullet. These cartridges are almost identical in many ways. You also get a large diameter hole with the 338 Win Mag since it is a bigger caliber. The question is – is the 16.6% more recoil worth the marginally better performance?
300 Win Mag vs 6.8 Western
The .300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) and the 6.8 Western are both intriguing choices for long-range shooters, but they serve different niches in the ballistic world. The 300 Win Mag is a well-established cartridge known for its versatility and power, while the 6.8 Western, a newer entrant, is gaining attention for its long-range capabilities and efficiency. Let’s compare these two cartridges across various ballistic aspects.
Velocity
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Maintains a high muzzle velocity, starting at approximately 2960 fps. At 500 yards it still has 1982 fps.
6.8 Western (175 gr): Offers basically the same muzzle velocity, 2970 fps, for a similar weighted 175 gr bullet. It also maintains its velocity better, at 500 yards it still maintains 2251 fps, a 269 fps difference.
Trajectory
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Has an almost identical bullet trajectory as the 6.8 Western. At 500 yards the 300 Win Mag has 41-inches of bullet drop.
6.8 Western (175 gr): At 500 yards, this cartridge has 40-inches of bullet drop, a difference of 1-inch, within 500 yards its tenths of inches.
Energy
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Has more energy within 175 yards. At the muzzle, it has 3502 ft-lbs of energy, 100 yards is 3013 ft-lbs, and at 200 yards has 2582 ft-lbs, this is the distance where the 6.8 Western starts to outperform the 300 Win Mag. Meaning it’s better suited for more power at closer distances.
6.8 Western (175 gr): At the muzzle it has 3226 ft-lbs (-276 ft-lbs), at 100 yards it has 2902 ft-lbs (-111 ft-lbs), and at 200 yards it has 2605 ft-lbs of energy (+23 ft-lbs). This means it’s a more optimal choice for more power at further distances.
Wind Drift
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Exhibits good resistance to wind drift, but not as good at the 6.8 Western. There is 20-inches of wind drift at 500 yards.
6.8 Western (175 gr): Its superior aerodynamic efficiency gives it an advantage in wind drift resistance. There is 14.2 inches of wind drift at 500 yards, edging out the 300 Win Mag with almost a 6-inch difference.
The calculation assumes 10 mph crosswind*
Recoil
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The 300 Win Mag has 35.08 ft-lbs of recoil, which is more than the 6.8 Western.
6.8 Western (175 gr): Offers less recoil of 32.52 ft-lbs, which is about 7.3% less recoil, which might be preferable for shooters looking for long-range capability with less kick.
Calculated Assuming 7 lbs Rifle*
In summary, the 300 Win Mag and the 6.8 Western both offer excellent long-range capabilities, but they cater to slightly different preferences in the shooting community. The 300 Win Mag provides the classic combination of power and precision, suitable for a wide range of hunting and long-range shooting applications. The 6.8 Western, with its focus on heavier, high-BC bullets and more moderate recoil, it’s an attractive option for shooters who prioritize long-range efficiency and comfort.
300 Win Mag vs 30 Nosler
When comparing the .300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) and the 30 Nosler, we are looking at two high-performing cartridges renowned for their long-range shooting capabilities. Using the specific data from our final tables, let’s dive into a detailed comparison of these two cartridges across key ballistic parameters.
Velocity
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The initial velocity of 2960 fps not as fast as the 30 Nosler, nor does it catch up or close the distance at any distance from 0-500 yards. It maintains about 250 fps slower speeds from 0-500 yards.
30 Nosler (180 gr): Has the fastest initial velocity of any cartridge in this comparison at 3200 fps. It’s also the fastest 30-caliber cartridge from 0 to 500 yards in this comparison. It also maintains its speed at distance better than the 300 Win Mag.
Bullet Trajectory
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Provides a flat trajectory, but not as flat as the 30 Nosler. At 500 yards it has 41-inches of drop.
30 Nosler (175 gr): Offers the secondflattest trajectory of any cartridge in this comparison, just behind the 28 Nosler. It outperforms the 300 Win Mag at every range. At 500 yards it only has 32.5-inches of bullet drop, a difference of 8.5-inches.
Energy
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Delivers substantial energy, 3502 ft-lbs at the muzzle, and maintains its energy pretty well at distance with 1570 ft-lbs at 500 yards. Even so, it does not have nearly the same energy as the 30 Nosler. However, it does maintain its energy just as efficiently as the 30 Nosler, remaining a consistent +/- 550 ft-lbs less powerful from 0-500 yards.
30 Nosler (180 gr): The 30 Nosler, with its higher velocity, generates even greater energy, approximately 4092 ft-lbs at the muzzle, a 590 ft-lbs difference. At 500 yards it still maintains a solid 2105 ft-lbs, a 535 ft-lbs difference.
Wind Drift
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Does well in the wind, but not as good as the 28 Nosler. At 500 yards it has 20-inches of wind drift.
30 Nosler (180 gr): It outperforms the 300 Win Mag at every range but not by a lot. At 500 yards it only has 14.2-inches of drift, a difference of 5.8-inches.
The calculation assumes 10 mph crosswind*
Recoil
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The 300 Win Mag has 35.08 ft-lbs of recoil, which is significant, but not as bad as the 30 Nosler.
30 Nosler (180 gr): Its powerful performance comes with the trade-off of increased kickback (41.48 ft-lbs), 18.3% more than the 300 Win Mag, requiring good recoil management for optimal shooting.
Calculated Assuming 7 lbs Rifle*
In conclusion, both the 300 Win Mag and the 30 Nosler are exceptional cartridges for long-range shooting, each excelling in different areas. The 300 Win Mag is a proven, versatile cartridge offering excellent all-around performance. In contrast, the 30 Nosler, with its higher velocity and energy, might be the better choice for shooters seeking maximum performance at extended ranges, especially in windy conditions. However, this comes with the trade-off of increased recoil.
300 Win Mag vs 7mm PRC
The .300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) and the 7mm Precision Rifle Cartridge (7mm PRC) are two impressive cartridges in the realm of long-range shooting, each with its own set of strengths. While the 300 Win Mag has a long-standing reputation for power and versatility, the 7mm PRC is a newer entry known for its efficiency and long-range capabilities. Let’s compare these cartridges based on our detailed ballistic tables.
Velocity
300 Win Mag (180 gr): This cartridge showcases a muzzle velocity of approximately 2960 fps, which is very similar to the 7mm PRC. Things change fast after the muzzle, though, the 7 PRC is much more efficient and retains its speed better across all ranges, pulling far ahead of the 300 Win Mag. At 500 yards the 300 Win Mag is at 1982 fps.Â
7mm PRC (175 gr): Offers a slightly faster 3000 fps velocity than the 300 Win Mag at the muzzle with 3000 fps. But it is much more efficient, quickly pulling away from the 300 Win Mag at a distance. At 500 yards it still maintains 2345 fps, a 363 fps difference. This is the second fastest cartridge in this comparison at long-distance shooting, just behind the 28 Nosler at 500 yards.
Trajectory
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Does not have as flat of a trajectory as the 7 PRC, but it’s not too far off. At 500 yards there are 41-inches of drop.
7mm PRC (175 gr): Also provides a relatively flat trajectory, benefiting from efficient bullet design. At 500 yards there are 34.1-inches drop, a difference of 6.9-inches.
Energy
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The muzzle energy is 3502 ft-lbs which is almost identical to the 7 PRC at the muzzle. At 500 yards the 300 Win Mag has 1570 ft-lbs of energy which is much less energy than the 7 PRC.
7mm PRC (175 gr): As stated, the muzzle energy is almost identical at 3497 ft-lbs, a 5 ft-lbs difference. It immediately pulls away from the 300 Win Mag, maintaining much more energy downrange. At 500 yards the 7mm PRC has 2137 ft-lbs of energy, a difference of 567 ft-lbs which is substantial.
Wind Drift
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Does well in the wind, but not nearly as good as that efficient 7 PRC. At 500 yards it has 20-inches of wind drift.
7mm PRC (175 gr): This cartridge has the least wind drift of any cartridge in this comparison, coming in at 11.5-inches of drift at 500 yards, almost half of the 300 Win Mag! Resulting in 8.5-inches less wind drift at 500 yards.
The calculation assumes 10 mph crosswind*
Recoil
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The 300 Win Mag has 35.08 ft-lbs of recoil, it has about the same but just a little more than the 7mm PRC.
7mm PRC (175 gr): This cartridge has 34.41 ft-lbs of recoil, only a 1.9% difference. The recoil is almost identical to the 300 Win Mag, you wouldn’t even notice a difference between the two cartridges.
Calculated Assuming 7 lbs Rifle*
In summary, the 7mm PRC is a better, more efficient cartridge in every way than the 300 Win Mag. The 7 PRC has better velocity, trajectory, energy, wind drift, and recoil than the 300 Win Mag. The benefits of the 7 PRC feel almost exponential past the muzzle compared to the 300 Win Mag.
300 Win Mag vs 300 WSM
The .300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) and the .300 Winchester Short Magnum (300 WSM) are both highly respected cartridges in the world of long-range shooting, each offering distinct advantages. While the 300 Win Mag is renowned for its long-range capabilities and versatility, the 300 WSM is known for its efficiency and shorter action design. Let’s delve into a comprehensive comparison of these two 30-caliber cartridges.
Velocity
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Boasts a higher muzzle velocity of around 2960 fps, but is using a lighter 180 gr bullet. The 300 Win Mag is faster to about 250 yards, then the 300 WSM takes the lead. At 500 yards the 300 Win Mag maintains 1982 fps.Â
300 WSM (200 gr): Offers a solid 2810 fps at the muzzle for a 200 gr bullet. While this is slower at first, at about 250 yards the 300 WSM has more velocity and maintains increasingly better velocity out to 500 yards. At 500 yards the 300 WSM maintains 2105 fps, so only a marginal 123 fps difference.
Trajectory
300 Win Mag (180 gr) and 300 WSM (200 gr):Â The 180 gr 300 Win Mag and the 200 gr 300 WSM have almost identical bullet trajectories. You won’t notice a difference between these two cartridges. They both have about 41-inches of bullet drop at 500 yards.
Energy
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Has 3502 ft-lbs at the muzzle, which is basically the same as the 300 WSM, but the more efficient 300 WSM retains energy better and has significantly more energy at 500 yards. At 500 yards the 300 Win Mag has 1570 ft-lbs.
300 WSM (200 gr): Has 3506 ft-lbs of energy at the muzzle, almost identical to the 300 Win Mag. However, it outperforms the 300 Win Mag at every other distance from +/- 25-500 yards. At 500 yards the 300 WSM has 1967 ft-lbs of energy, a 397 ft-lbs difference.
Wind Drift
300 Win Mag (180 gr): Does not perform as well as the 300 WSM, there is more drift with this cartridge. At 500 yards there is 20-inches of drift.
300 WSM (200 gr): Performs better overall, at 500 yards there is only 14.8-inches of drop, a 5.2-inch difference.
The calculation assumes 10 mph crosswind*
Recoil
300 Win Mag (180 gr): The 300 Win Mag has 35.08 ft-lbs of recoil, which is slightly less than the 300 WSM but not by much. You won’t be able to tell the difference.
300 WSM (200 gr): This cartridge has 35.61 ft-lbs of recoil, almost identical to the 300 Win Mag (only1.5% more recoil). But remember, this is a heavier grain bullet.
Calculated Assuming 7 lbs Rifle*
In summary, while both the 300 Win Mag and the 300 WSM offer exceptional long-range capabilities, they cater to slightly different preferences and needs in the shooting community. The 300 Win Mag provides classic, tried-and-true performance with excellent all-around ballistic characteristics. In contrast, the 300 WSM, with its compact design and comparable performance, still outperforms the 300 Win Mag. This makes it an attractive option for those who prefer a shorter-action rifle without compromising on power and range.
Final Thoughts
In the realm of long-range cartridges, the .300 Winchester Magnum (300 Win Mag) stands out for its exceptional versatility. Through comparisons with various popular cartridges, it consistently demonstrates excellent velocity, flat trajectory, and high energy. While newer cartridges offer specific advancements, the 300 Win Mag maintains its status as a reliable and powerful choice for a wide range of shooting applications affirming its position as a favorite among long-range shooters and hunters.
Looking through the graphs of all of the cartridges, you’ll notice a general pattern, the 300 Win Mag is generally located smack dab in the middle of all the other cartridges. This shows its versatility, it doesn’t necessarily do one thing the best but it does everything well. What are your thoughts? Share them in my Facebook Group.
Through detailed ballistic comparisons, we will explore bullet velocity, trajectory, energy, wind drift, and recoil, providing a clear and data-driven perspective on how the 30-06 stacks up vs its contemporaries.
In the ever-evolving world of hunting and shooting sports, the 30-06 Springfield cartridge has stood the test of time as a versatile and reliable choice for hunters and marksmen alike. With over a century of history, this iconic round has become a benchmark for comparing the effectiveness of various hunting cartridges.
In this article, the 30-06 Springfield is compared side-by-side with the:
308 Win
270 Win
6.5 Creedmoor
300 Win Mag
7mm Rem Mag
223 Rem
30-30 Win
25-06 Rem.
I used 150-grain bullets for most cartridges so it would be more of an apples-to-apples comparison. Some of the smaller calibers don’t make bullets that big so I used a common bullet grain for that cartridge. Keep in mind that with different bullet grains, you will get different results than shown below. But you can use the information below to determine the potential of each caliber.
Table of Contents
Bullet Velocity Comparison
The 30-06 Has More Velocity Than:
The .30-06 Springfield demonstrates a high bullet velocity, crucial for long-range hunting efficacy. For example, at 300 yards, the .30-06 maintains a velocity of over 2000 feet per second (fps) at 300 yards. It has more velocity than the 270 Win, 30-30 Win, and 308 Win. Within about 200 yards it also has a higher velocity than the 6.5 Creedmoor.
The 30-06 Has Less Velocity Than:
Although the 30-06 has more velocity within about 200 yards, the 6.5 Creedmoor has more velocity out past about 200 yards. The 223 Rem, 25-06 Rem, 7mm Rem Mag, and 300 Win Mag all have higher velocities than the 30-06 Springfield.
Top 3 Cartridges with Fastest Velocity:
300 Win Mag
7mm Rem Mag
25-06 Rem
(223 at short distances)
Worst 3 Cartridges with Slowest Velocity:
30-30 Win
270 Win
308 Win
Bullet Trajectory Comparison
The 30-06 Has Better Trajectory Than
The .30-06 Springfield has a decent trajectory. It’s flatter shooting than the 30-30 Win, 270 Win, and 308 Win and almost identical to the 6.5 Creedmoor out to 400 yards.
The 30-06 Has Worse Trajectory Than
Although the 30-06 has a decent trajectory, it is not the best in this comparison. The 6.5 Creedmoor is better from 400-500 yards and the 223 Rem, 25-06 Rem, 7mm Rem Mag, and 300 Win Mag are all flatter shooting than the 30-06 Springfield.
Top 3 Cartridges with Flattest Trajectory:
7mm Rem Mag
300 Win Mag
25-06 Rem
Worst 3 Cartridges with Least Flattest Trajectory:
30-30 Win
270 Win
308 Win
Bullet Energy Comparison
In terms of energy, the .30-06 is a powerhouse. At about 220 yards the 30-06 is the 3rd most powerful cartridge, behind the 7mm Rem Mag and 300 Win Mag. After this distance, bullets that can retain their energy better beat the 30-06. For example, the 25-06 Rem starts to have more energy at that 220-yard mark, then the 6.5 Creedmoor has more energy at about 280 yards.
The 308 Win, 270 Win, 30-30 Win, and 223 all have less energy than the 30-06 at all ranges with the 223 Rem and 30-30 Win not even being close.
Top 3 Cartridges with the Most Energy:
300 Win Mag
7mm Rem Mag
30-06 Springfield (to 220 yards)
Worst 3 Cartridges with the Least Energy:
223 Rem
30-30 Win
6.5 Creedmoor (within 100 yards)
270 Win (past 100 yards)
Wind Drift Ballistic Comparison
Again, the 30-06 is right in the middle of the road of all these cartridges. The 7mm Rem Mag, 20-05 Rem, 300 Win Mag, and 6.5 Creedmoor have less wind drift than the 30-06. These cartridges have quite a noticeable improvement in wind drift compared to the 30-06, especially at longer distances.
The 308 Win, 223 Rem, 270 Win, and 30-30 Win all have worse wind draft than the 30-06, with the 30-30 Win and 270 Win being notably more.
Top 3 Wind Drift Cartridges
7mm Rem Mag
25-06 Rem
300 Win Mag
Worst 3 Wind Drift Cartridges
30-30 Win
270 Win
308 Win and 223 Rem (tie)
Recoil Graph Comparison
The recoil of the .30-06, while substantial, is manageable coming in at about 24.27 ft-lbs of recoil energy with 14.94 fps of recoil velocity. It has less recoil than the 7mm Rem Mag and the 300 Win Mag, making it the 3rd most powerful recoil in this comparison.
The 308 has a similar performance as the 30-06, but you can see that there are about 5 ft-lbs of less recoil for the same grain bullet. It was also interesting to see that the recoil of the 270 was greater than the 308 given the 270 did not perform well in this comparison and that it has less energy generally than the 308.
Top 3 Least Recoil Cartridges
223 Rem
30-30 Win
6.5 Creedmoor
Worst 3 Most Recoil Cartridges
300 Win Mag
7mm Rem Mag
30-06 Springfield
Comparative Analysis of the Cartridges
30-06 vs 308 Winchester
Same Grain, Same Gun: Although the 30-06 outcompetes the 308 Winchester in every measurable category except recoil, the differences between the two are almost not noticeable when using the same grain bullet. The 308 is a smaller more efficient cartridge than the 30-06 and can be more versatile since it can be used in shorter action rifles.
Bigger Bullets: That said, the 30-06 has a bigger and heavier bullet selection which makes it more suitable for larger game like elk, bear, moose…etc.
30-06 vs 270 Winchester
Inefficient: The 30-06 outperformed the 270 Winchester in every category. Based on the result in the graph, the 270 Winchester did not hold up to what the 30-06 can do, especially at longer distances. That said, within 200 yards the 270 Winchester is a great cartridge. It seems a little inefficient though because it has almost the same recoil as the 30-06 but does not perform as well. Even the 308 Win performed better in every category and had less recoil than the 270 Win.
30-06 vs 6.5 Creedmoor
Recoil and Range: The 6.5 Creedmoor has gained popularity for its lower recoil and range, but the .30-06 has a higher energy profile, making it suitable for larger game, especially within 300 yards. Past 300 yards the 6.5 Creedmoor is a better choice due to having more energy, less wind drift, more velocity, and a slightly better trajectory when using a similar grain bullet.
Bullet Weight Range: While the 6.5 Creedmoor excels with bullets in the 140-150 grain range, the .30-06’s ability to handle heavier bullets (up to 220 gr) gives it an edge for versatility in hunting various game sizes.
30-06 vs 300 Win Mag
Short-Medium Range King: The 300 Win Mag beats the 30-06 Springfield and every other cartridge in just about every category. It has more energy, higher velocity, better trajectory, and less wind drift, and not by a little, it beats the 30-06 by quite a lot in all these categories. Its only competitor is the 7mm Rem Mag, past 220 yards the 7mm Rem Mag is more deadly.
The one downside to this cartridge is the recoil. Shooting the same 150-grain bullet, the 300 Win Mag will have 35.12 ft-lbs of recoil to the 24.27 ft-lbs of recoil of the 30-06, that is over 10 ft-lbs difference!
30-06 vs 7mm Rem Mag
Long Range King: 7mm Rem Mag has the best velocity (past 220 yards), trajectory, energy (past 220 yards), and wind drift values of any cartridge in this comparison. Using the same-sized bullet the 7mm Rem Mag is far and away better than the 30-06 Springfield, even within 220 yards. The 7mm Rem Mags only close competitor is the 300 Win Mag. which is better within 220 yards.
Recoil: I found it surprising the that recoil of the 7mm Rem Mag is only slightly more than the 30-06 Springfield, it is probably noticeable, but not by much. That gives it an edge over the 300 Win Mag for a lot of people and could be a reason to go with the 7mm Win Mag over the 30-06 because now you’ll be more effective for long-range western hunts and it’ll work better than the 30-06 in brush country.
30-06 vs 223 Remington
Intended Use and Game Size: The .223 is more suited to smaller game and varmint hunting due to its significantly lower recoil and energy. In contrast, the .30-06’s higher energy levels and recoil make it more versatile for large game.
30-06 vs 30-30 Winchester
Recoil: The 30-06 Springfield is far and away better in every way than the 30-30 Winchester. The 30-30 was the worst cartridge in this review in every category, especially for a larger caliber bullet. The only benefit is that it has a much lower recoil than the 30-06 (less than half). Besides the 223 Rem which is a MUCH smaller cartridge, the 30-30 Win had the least recoil.
Other Options For New Hunters: Although many new hunters start with a 30-30 Win because of the low recoil, the ballistics aren’t great. Most beginners can handle a 6.5 Creedmoor. I also just finished a blog post on the new 8.6 Blackout cartridge, which is between the .243 and 6.5 Creedmoor. Make it an excellent beginner cartridge. It also has subsonic capabilities which give it a recoil similar to that of a .22 LR – Read Here: The 8.6 Blackout Cartridge: Ballistic Comparisons, Pros and Cons.
30-06 vs 25-06 Remington
Bullet Size and Selection: The 30-06 can shoot larger bullets. In this comparison, we had to compare a 120 gr 25-06 bullet to a 150 gr 30-06 bullet because the 25-caliber bullet doesn’t have bullets that big, so it’s not quite apples to apples but it’s a good comparison to a realistic use case. Since the 30-06 can shoot bigger bullets it is more versatile and creates bigger wound channels.
Ballistics: The 25-06 Remington does a lot of things better than the 30-06. For example, it has more velocity, which gives it a better trajectory, competing even with the 7mm Rem Mag and 300 Win Mag. Past 220 yards, it has more energy than the 150 gr 30-06 bullet (within 100 yards the 30-06 is quite a bit more deadly). It is the 2nd best cartridge on this list in wind deflection, even beating the 300 Win Mag.
Recoil: the 25-06 Rem also has a lot less recoil than the 30-06 (a whopping 7 lbs ft-lbs less!).
Conclusion
In summary, the 30-06 Springfield remains a highly respected and versatile hunting cartridge. It competes closely with both traditional and modern cartridges, offering a balance of power, trajectory, and manageable recoil. Its adaptability for various game sizes and hunting scenarios continues to make it a preferred choice for hunters worldwide.
Since it is such a versatile cartridge a lot of hunters often use it as a benchmark for comparing other cartridges when buying new rifles. Hopefully, this information has helped you determine which caliber is right for you.
The world of firearms and ammunition is ever-evolving, with constant innovations aimed at enhancing performance and addressing the needs of various hunting applications. One such recent development is the 8.6 Blackout hunting cartridge.
The cartridge was introduced in 2018 by firearms and ammunition manufacturer Q, LLC,in 2022 barrels and rifles started being manufactured.
This 8.6 Blackout article provides ballistic graphs (energy, trajectory, velocity, and recoil) of the new wildcat cartridge (subsonic and supersonic) and how they compare to mainstream cartridges including its main rival – the 300 Blackout.
From these graphs, you can quickly see what the 8.6 Blackout is made of. Pros and cons are drawn from conclusions based on this information.
Information in this article is for educational purposes and should be used only as preliminary information.
Supersonic Pros
Works in AR-10 Rifles with a barrel swap
Can also shoot subsonic rounds
3:1 Twist rate
Better Than 300 Blackout
BIG caliber bullet (8.8 mm or .338 in)
Short, Light, Compact Firearm Options
Great Short to Medium-Range Round (0-200y)
Supersonic Cons
Bonded or copper bullets only due to the high twist rate
Not a great long-range option
New cartridge with limited rifles and ammo
Not SAAMI Approved (at the time of this post)
More recoil than Supersonic 300 Blackout
Subsonic Pros
Works in AR-10 Rifles with a barrel swap
Super quiet subsonic rounds
With Suppressor = Large quiet cartridge
More powerful supersonic options
3:1 twist rate
Better Performance Than 300 Blackout
Subsonic expanding bullets
Great subsonic accuracy due to a 3:1 twist rate
BIG caliber bullet (8.8 mm or .338 in)
Short, Light, Compact Firearm Options
Great Short Range Round (0-100 yards)
Low Recoil
FUN
Subsonic Cons
Not flat shooting
bonded or copper bullets only due to the high twist rate
Not for long-distance hunting
New cartridge with limited rifles and ammo
Not SAAMI Approved (at the time of this post)
More recoil than Subsonic 300 Blackout
Table of Contents
Why The 8.6 Blackout Cartridge
There are three main goals of this cartridge:
Fill a niche in the hunting cartridge market using big, subsonic, high-performance bullets in a lightweight, compact rifle with a short barrel and ideally a silencer for ultimate stealthiness
Have the ability to shoot supersonic in addition to subsonic
Improve upon the popular 300 Blackout cartridge
Specifications of the 8.6 Blackout
The 8.6 Blackout is a necked-up version of the popular 6.5mm Creedmoor cartridge. The cartridge’s overall length is similar to that of the 6.5mm Creedmoor, allowing it to be chambered in rifles designed for that cartridge with minimal modifications.
It features a large caliber projectile, measuring 8.6mm or .338 inches in diameter. Although a large bullet, it was designed for compatibility with compact AR-10-style rifles and MR25 magazines. Because of this design, the bullet is about the same length as the cartridge case which gives it an interesting look.
The bullet weight for the 8.6 Blackout ranges from 155 to 350 grains with subsonic or supersonic options ranging from about 1000 to 2400 fps, offering a variety of options for hunters. The cartridge operates at moderate pressures, contributing to increased barrel life and ease of reloading.
From the graph below you can see that the big, heavy, slow-moving subsonic rounds don’t have a lot of energy but they retain their energy extremely well.
Although the 300 Blackout seems like it could be slightly better at retaining its energy, the 8.6 Blackout has much more energy within 0-200 yards, which is realistically the far end of the range for this gun (more on that later).
Supersonic Energy Compared to Other Cartridges
From the graph, you’ll also see that the 8.6 Blackout supersonic rounds have a lot more energy, which is to be expected with a faster bullet.
It is much more powerful than the comparable supersonic 300 Blackout cartridge. It also beats the time-tested 243, and the 30-30 Winchester by a lot, especially after 75 yards.
Energy is a big deal when you’re talking about what kind of animals you can take with a particular caliber, but it’s not the only thing to consider. Let’s move on to the bullet trajectory of this big heavy round.
Subsonic Trajectory Compared to Other Cartridges
You can see from the trajectory graph (below) that the two subsonic rounds are pretty darn obvious. They drop off fast compared to the supersonic cartridges. Now for the sake of this graph, I have every cartridge zeroed at 200 yards, but you probably would want to zero these subsonic rounds around 75 yards because you’re likely not going to be shooting long distances at animals with these subsonic rounds.
Comparing the subsonic 8.6 Blackout to the subsonic 300 Blackout you’ll notice that the trajectory is about the same, with no real advantage to the 8.6 Blackout within its shooting capabilities.
Supersonic Trajectory Compared to Other Cartridges
Supersonic is a bit of a different story. Out to about 200 yards, both the 300 Blackout and 8.6 Blackout are flat shooting. At about 250 yards they start to separate off from the rest of the pack, with the 8.6 performing slightly better, especially at longer ranges.
Even when shot supersonic the 8.6 has a more arced trajectory than the more traditional rifles on this chart. That said, it does beat the well-known 30-30 cartridge. It’s able to do this with a 210-grain bullet vs the 30-30’s 150 grain which is impressive.
All cartridges zerod at 200 yards for ease of comparison
We now have energy and trajectory under our belt, now we’ll dive into another important component – velocity.
Subsonic Velocity Compared to Other Cartridges
Based on the graph, you can see that the subsonic rounds barely lose velocity from 0 to 500 yards. They retain their velocity much better than the supersonic bullets. That said, they don’t start with much velocity to begin with.
Here’s the science behind it:
Kinetic energy: It’s the energy of an object in motion, calculated as 1/2 * mass * velocity^2. So, for a constant velocity, the heavier the bullet, the higher its kinetic energy.
Air resistance: As a bullet travels through air, it experiences air resistance, which acts as a frictional force trying to slow it down. This force is proportional to the bullet’s surface area and the square of its velocity.
Mass and surface area: Heavier bullets generally have a smaller surface area relative to their mass compared to lighter bullets. This means the air resistance acting on them is proportionately less, allowing them to lose their velocity (and hence kinetic energy) at a slower rate.
Supersonic Velocity Compared to Other Cartridges
The supersonic 8.6 Blackout cartridge interestingly starts slower than the 30-30 Win, but quickly catches up at around 175 yards because it can retain speed better. What is also interesting is that the 8.6 blackout, even though it is a lower velocity bullet within the first 175 yards it still has more energy than the 30-30. So, speed isn’t everything in this case.
Comparing apples to apples, the 8.6 Blackout has more velocity in both supersonic and subsonic rounds than the 300 Blackout.
1:3 Twist Rate and Rotational Energy
The 8.6 Blackout has a 1:3 twist rate which means it completes one rotation every three inches! This is 2-3x faster than traditional rifles and was born out of necessity to stabilize the large, slow-moving, subsonic bullets during flight.
Another benefit of the fast twist rate is when the bullet expands it creates a ‘blender effect’ as it goes through the target supposedly improving terminal performance.
Recoil Compared to Other Cartridges (Supersonic & Subsonic Comparisons)
First, let’s define recoil energy vs recoil velocity because both are good to know:
Recoil Energy: The “kick” from firing, depends on gun weight and bullet power.
Recoil Velocity: How fast the gun jumps back, affects the sight picture and follow-up shots (how fast the kick is).
Below is a comparison chart showing 8.6 Blackout supersonic and subsonic cartridges compared to other common cartridges:
Calculated Based on rifle weights of 7 lbs*
8.6 BLK Subsonic Recoil
From the bar graph, you can see the subsonic rounds are incredibly light on recoil, which makes sense because there’s not a lot of gunpowder in these cartridges. The 300 Blackout does have less recoil than the 8.6 Blackout. The subsonic 8.6 BLK recoil is about equal to the 300 BLK supersonic cartridges.
The subsonic cartridges have about 60% reduced recoil compared to the supersonic counterpart in this graph. Additionally, it’s an 80% reduction in recoil from a 30-06 Springfield!
8.6 BLK Supersonic Recoil
The supersonic 300 BLK also has less recoil than the supersonic 8.6 BLK. The subsonic 8.6 BLK has about the same recoil as the supersonic 300 BLK.
A great comparison is the 30-30 Winchester which has almost identical recoil to the supersonic 8.6 BLK, yet the 8.6 has a better cartridge than the 30-30 Win in just about every other way. This means it seems the 8.6 is a more efficient round than the 30-30.
The supersonic 8.6 cartridge has about 50% reduced recoil compared to the 30-06 Springfield cartridge used in this graph.
8.6 Blackout Hunting Applications
8.6 Subsonic – What You Can Hunt
Range
The subsonic rounds are big, heavy, and slow. This means they are not ideal for long-range shooting. They’ve got quite an arch as shown on the Trajectory Graph when zeroed at 200 yards, so 100 yards is probably the max for hunting for most people. I’d recommend sighting these in at 75 yards and hunting within 100 yards.
Since the bullets fly slowly there is a bit of a delay from when you pull the trigger to when the bullet hits its mark. So, you’d need to be sure the animal won’t be moving if you’re shooting at further ranges.
Animals
You’re looking at about 700-800 ft-lbs of energy between 0-200 yards, which isn’t much but is enough to kill deer and hog-sized animals with good shot placement.Â
8.6 Supersonic – What You Can HuntÂ
Range
The supersonic rounds are still big and heavy, but they’re around 2x faster. This increase in speed drastically increases the bullet’s energy, going from 750 ft-lbs (subsonic) to about 1750 ft-lbs (supersonic) out to 100 yards.
This means you can hunt at much longer ranges more effectively. With the significantly less bullet drop and increased energy, shooting out to 300 yards is perfectly fine, you still have 1400 ft-lbs of energy at that distance. Based on the Trajectory Graph, After 300 yards it starts to drop off fairly quickly.
Animals
With the increased energy, velocity, and trajectory you have a much more lethal round. Based on the graphs the supersonic 8.6 Blackout has a similar trajectory as the 30-30 Winchester with the increased energy of a .243. However, you get these values with a BIG .338 caliber bullet increasing entrance and exit holes.
You should feel comfortable shooting anything with the 8.6 Blackout that you would shoot with a .243 Winchester out to 200-300 yards since the 8.6 is an all-around more powerful round. Specifically, we’re talking about hunting animals like deer, hog, and close-range black bear.
Just keep in mind the 243 Win trajectory is much better due to its high velocity, so past 200-300 yards the 243 is likely a better choice despite it having less power.
Who’s It For?
8.6 Blackout Subsonic – Who’s It For?
Beginners – Kids and Women
One of the best applications I can think of for the Subsonic 8.6 Blackout would be for kids and women who are new to hunting and shooting and want to start on a gun that is powerful enough to take down large animals at close range but not have the loud bang and recoil of a supersonic round. This will reduce flinching which leads to having more fun behind the gun and improved accuracy.
Stealthy Hunting
I think there are a few uses for the Subsonic 8.6 Blackout cartridges. It would be a great silence hog hunting, close-range predator hunting, night hunting, and nuisance animal removal in populated areas. Basically, all of the uses of the 300 Blackout, but the 8.6 will do it better.
Fun
Let’s be real, it would be so fun to shoot such a small, compact, and quiet rifle. It’s the type of quiet that puts a smile on your face and it won’t give you a headache or a sore shoulder. Check out “The Fix” gun by Q,LLC, you can imagine how much fun shooting these would be.
8.6 Blackout Supersonic – Who’s It For?
The supersonic loads are for someone who is looking for a short to medium-range rifle (0-200 yards) that has a little more energy than a 243 Winchester, but not as much as a 6.5 Creedmoor but would benefit from bigger entrance and exit holes.
This could be someone who has been using a 30-30 Winchester but is looking for something more powerful, especially in those 75-200-yard ranges without adding more recoil.
Conclusion
The design philosophy of the 8.6 Blackout results in a cartridge that is better than its main rival, the .300 Blackout, in every way except in recoil. This includes supersonic and subsonic applications.
Strengths
The ballistic analysis of the 8.6 Blackout reveals its strengths. The cartridge excels in short to medium-range hunting scenarios offering two distinct options: a quieter subsonic round for stealthy applications and a more powerful supersonic option for increased lethality. Its fast twist rate of 1:3 enhances both accuracy and likely terminal performance.
Limitations
Despite these advantages, the 8.6 Blackout is not without its limitations. It’s not ideal for flat shooting, especially with its subsonic rounds, and is limited in long-distance applications. Furthermore, being a relatively new cartridge, it faces challenges in terms of availability and broader acceptance in the firearms community.
Future of the 8.6 Blackout
Looking ahead, the 8.6 Blackout has the potential to carve out a niche in the hunting market, especially for those seeking a high-performance, big-bore cartridge in a compact and lightweight platform. Its future success will depend on overcoming current limitations and gaining wider acceptance among hunters and firearm enthusiasts.
While challenges like cost and limited rifle availability remain, the growing community and manufacturer support suggest the 8.6 Blackout is more than just a niche interest. With continued refinement and increased adoption, this innovative cartridge may well find its way into the hunting landscape, proving that big things can come in small packages.
Here are 39 best gifts for bird hunters in 2025x, making it easy to find the perfect bird hunting gift (even for non-hunters). You’ll find hunting gift ideas for all types of bird hunters, at all budgets, and for any skill level.
This post contains Amazon and other affiliate links, which means I’ll receive a commission if you purchase through my link, at no extra cost to you. Of course, you are not obligated to use my links, but it does help fund these posts in hopes of bringing more value to you!
Blaze-orange is often a requirement for upland bird hunting. Even if it’s not required by law, it is never a bad idea to wear orange for safety. Gamehide makes a quality partially blaze-orange hunting vest specifically designed for upland bird hunters. It offers comfortable shoulder pads for shooting, many pockets, blood proof game pouch on the back for carrying game, and its briar proof which is key for longevity.
Cabela’s also makes a quality upland bird hunting vest. Like the Gamehide it also offers many pockets, padded shoulders, bird pouches, and is durable for longevity.
This hoodie is perfect for when temperatures start to dip because it is thicker and offers protection from wind. The large front pouch allows bird hunters easy access to important items which also contains pockets for shotgun shells. This hoodie also has a built-in orange vest that has a bird pouch, making it the perfect cold-weather clothing gift for bird hunters.
Rynoskin is a chemical-free baselayer that helps prevent bugs from penetrating the tight mesh. Bugs like ticks and mosquitos can be a big annoyance when upland bird hunting. Bug protection clothing is helpful for reducing the number of bug bites when bird hunting. Check out my full review here: Rynoskin Review: Insect and Tick Proof Clothing | Does it Work?
Brush pants have reinforced nylon fronts of the legs to prevent wear and tear when walking through brush and thorns. These pants will last longer than regular pants and for this reason, they are worth the money in the long run. Additionally, they are water-resistant and stretch for maximum comfort.
These boots are designed for upland hunters, they are a lightweight waterproof leather boots with a moccasin feel for the best comfort while upland bird hunting. They’re also 9-inches tall so they can be worn in shallow water. The height also protects ankles from the brush when walking.
Because these Grange boots are waterproof, lightweight, and have an ankle-tight form they make one of the best gifts for bird hunters. They’re so comfortable and lightweight that it feels like you’re wearing sneakers. They’re also very durable, brush and thorns will not puncture the nylon-lined rubber.
Hunting and wildlife artwork is one of the best hunting gifts for bird hunters because every time he sees it he will think of you. Hunting artwork is a great conversation piece when company is over. Additionally, when you pick out a specific piece of artwork, it shows that you took the time to choose something better than a generic gift.
In celebration or defeat, a cold one always soothes the soul after a long day in the field. Get the upland bird hunter in your life a custom wall-mounted bird hunting bottle opener for their home, man cave, or hunting camp for a personalized touch.
Get one of your favorite bird hunting photos printed on a slab of wood. The combination of a personalized photo on a slab of wood is unique and makes for one of the best Christmas gifts for hunters.
Hunting smartwatches are one of the coolest gifts for hunters in 2025 because of their customizability and abundance of cool hunting features. For example, smartwatches are helpful tools for hunters because they have GPS, ABC (Altimeter, Barometer, and a Compass), weather, sunrise times, sunset times, moon phases…and much more.
*Price At Time of Post
**Battery Life Depends on Settings
OnX Hunt GPS Mobile App Subscription
Getting permission to hunt new properties is one of the most challenging aspects of hunting, especially for new hunters. The OnX Hunt App helps to solve this time-consuming process. OnX does this by showing property boundary lines as well as the owners of the property.
This is also one of the best last minute gifts for hunters because it is an online subscription-based hunting gift so there is no waiting for a physical product.
GoPro’s are one of the best gifts for bird hunters looking to get into filming hunts. The new internal computerized gimbal-like stabilization makes the footage look buttery smooth even with excessive movement. Not only do they have great stabilization but they also have 5K video, slow motion, and much more.
A multitool is a perfect gift for upland bird hunters. This 14-in-1 tool is not only convenient but in my experience, it manages to reduce a lot of frustration when things go awry or fall apart. There have been many times when the leatherman has saved the day. A common example for bird hunters is pulling porcupine quills out of a bird dog’s mouth and face.
The quintessential tool of the hunter needs to be maintained. Nothing is more annoying than trying to clean birds with a dull knife. A good quality knife sharpener will make it easy to get a sharp blade edge. This is a great option for a sharpening stone because it does not require oil, it only requires water to start sharpening.
The Havalon knife is one of the best gifts for bird hunters because it offers razor-sharp replaceable blades which are as sharp as surgical blades.
Also, re-sharpening a knife is time-consuming and inconvenient, with the Havalon you can easily replace the blade at any point during the field-dressing process.
Additionally, you can get different blades. There are regular blades, gut hooks, and saw blades for versatility and other hunting-related purposes.
The knife is the quintessential tool for hunters, this is a unique knife making is one of the best gifts for bird hunters
Getting wet and dirty from being in the elements when bird hunting and then repeatedly getting in your vehicle will wear out the seats. Seat covers keep their vehicle in good shape through the hunting seasons. Extra protection for vehicles is always appreciated especially during the hunting season when things can get dirty.
Permethrin is a strong insect repellent that works excellent against ticks and mosquitos. There are different methods of applying permethrin such as washing your clothes with it or spraying it on clothes. Either way, it is one of the most effective ways to keep bugs, especially ticks off of bird hunters.
Not only do clay pigeons and a clay pigeon launcher make a great gift for bird hunters, but they also create the foundation for a fun activity that many people can get involved in together.
This is definitely one of the top gifts for bird hunters because every bird hunter needs dry boots. There is nothing more uncomfortable than damp or wet boots the next day. Damp or wet boots also speed up getting frozen toes and getting blisters.
Soft coolers are perfect for day-long trips to keep lunches and drinks cold and fresh while bird hunting. These coolers are waterproof, mildew, have a tear-resistant exterior, and have the remarkable ability to stay cold as you’d expect from YETI and RTIC. It is important for hunters to have gear that stands up to the elements, and these coolers do just that which is why they are one of the best gifts for bird hunters.
Igloo coolers are great coolers for the price, they make some of the most affordable coolers that still work well. Although they won’t work as well at RTIC and Yeti coolers for keeping items cold for days at a time, they work very well for day-long hunting trips.
Best Mid-Range Bird Hunting Cooler Gift (65 Quart)
RTIC makes a really good cooler for a middle-ground price, they’re one of the best coolers for the money. They are built tough and keep things cold, making them one of the best gifts for bird hunters.
The Tundra Haul, wheeled cooler is fantastic for keeping things cool for long periods of time. They make great coolers for bird hunters going on long trips. Yeti coolers are heavy, the wheels and handle make a big difference when transporting this cooler.
Dog collars are excellent tools for training bird dogs and for keeping them safe if they’re thinking about making a poor decision (like with porcupines). Nothing beats a well-trained hunting dog, which is why these collars are one of the best gifts for bird hunters with dogs.
If the hunter you’re shopping for has more than one dog, then a dog collar system that is able to work with multiple dogs at the same time might be the more convenient and cheapest choice.
Dog seat covers make excellent gifts for anyone who has a hunting dog. No matter what, bird dogs get messy after a hunting trip. Hunting and training with a dog will usually result in a wet, muddy, brushy, and stinky pup. Seat covers keep the dog safe and keep the vehicle clean, especially after hunting trips.
A neoprene dog vest has many benefits. For example, they are buoyant which helps dogs swim, it keeps them warm, and protects them from debris like sticks and bushes. For these reasons, it is one of the best gifts for waterfowl hunters with dogs.
An upland dog vest has many benefits too. The biggest benefits are it protects them from debris like sticks and bushes. Vest also keeps dogs safe and visible. For these reasons, it is one of the best gifts for upland bird hunters with dogs.
A slip-lead leash is a simple leash that is great for bird dogs because they are designed to tighten under tension and release tension when tension is gone. This helps to train dogs not to pull on a leash and is a very important tool for a dog trainer.
Training dummies are a must for training bird dogs to retrieve birds. Good training dummies are durable and can float so they can be used in all realistic training settings.
A dog kennel is another must for bird dog owners. Not only do they keep your dog safe when traveling, but they can be used to teach puppy patience, bladder control, and more. A high-quality dog crate is worth it especially if the bird dog will spend a lot of its life in it. My post: Best Hunting Dog Kennels goes into more detail.Â
Howard Leight Sound Amplification Hearing Protection
Hearing protection is one of the best gifts you can get for a duck hunter. Keeping the ears protected during repeated shooting is essential for hearing longevity. If you know someone who needs a good pair of hearing protection they’ll appreciate it, and even more so in the long term.
A MOJO duck decoy is easily one of the best gifts for a waterfowl hunter. The spinning wings from this motorized decoy can be seen and attract ducks from very far distances. The MOJO gives ducks confidence in a decoy setup, making them commit harder offering more opportunities and better shots.